“But master, we are outnumbered by the Chinese Sith!”
“You’re fired commander, drown on your incompetence!”
Moderators: Charnwood, Bluemike
“But master, we are outnumbered by the Chinese Sith!”
i dont read democratic news , I get my info from credible sources . no pot call sir.The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:54 amWas it not you who said that you had formed the opinion that Zelensky is a crook from what you had read/seen on news media, yet you are now claiming that some news media including the BBC are fake and corrupt and that some people will believe anything they read?MMJR67 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:54 pmI do not trust any big network, or publication . over here all democrat controlled.hallamblue wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 8:28 am
a lot of people trash the BBC news...but Im not a political animal , but i do tend to trust most of what they report on... not sure any newpapers are trustworthy though , they are out to make a buck arent they .. and most appear to be owned by individuals with a Conservative political bias.
Rupert Murdock and your BBC are biased for sure.Joe Bidens admin gave the BBC millions to air their agenda.
FAKES NEWS SELLS and some people believe everything they read.
Pot - kettle - black![]()
NATO , COME ON . Without the US , GOOD LUCK.The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:50 amYes, but the US is not alone in having bases all over the world - many countries choose to operate military bases across the globe for security reasons. But they are content to have their base and leave the running of the country housing that base to that country's government - unlike the US who seems to think it has the God-given right to take anything it wants. It's obvious that Russia and China are a threat to the rest of the world, and NATO was doing a pretty good job of being in the way of that happening until Trump's ego got in the way and he decided that it would be he that was the saviour of the world.MMJR67 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:47 pmStrategic location of Greenland , we already have a base there, and had submarines based there in WW2, in the future England will be glad it happens.
Arctic areas will be sought by Russia and China, maybe others. Greenland included, this is strategic.
kind of like how we have bases all over Europe and the rest of the world to protect it and us.
lol typical American mentality, the whole world revolves around and needs the USA. Actually, it doesn't.MMJR67 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:33 pmNATO , COME ON . Without the US , GOOD LUCK.The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:50 amYes, but the US is not alone in having bases all over the world - many countries choose to operate military bases across the globe for security reasons. But they are content to have their base and leave the running of the country housing that base to that country's government - unlike the US who seems to think it has the God-given right to take anything it wants. It's obvious that Russia and China are a threat to the rest of the world, and NATO was doing a pretty good job of being in the way of that happening until Trump's ego got in the way and he decided that it would be he that was the saviour of the world.MMJR67 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 17, 2025 6:47 pmStrategic location of Greenland , we already have a base there, and had submarines based there in WW2, in the future England will be glad it happens.
Arctic areas will be sought by Russia and China, maybe others. Greenland included, this is strategic.
kind of like how we have bases all over Europe and the rest of the world to protect it and us.
We have a nuclear deterrent so no other country in their right mind would have a go at us even if they are better armed than we are. Unless, of course, Russia and China ever join forces - but if that happened there's nothing the US could do to save even themselves.marko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 11:39 amThe United Kingdom certainly needs the USA. After the dumbfuckers among us voted for Brexit, and the subsequent underlying EU disdain towards us, we’re a bit of a much bigger isolated target without the USA. We need them.
That comforting NATO “feel” doesn’t exist anymore.
As opposed to the dumbfucker remoaners amongst us who still cannot accept a democratic vote 9 years after the event? The EU is doing brilliantly isn't it... puts Trump issues into perspective when some people still want to be run remotely by the real EU...marko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 11:39 amThe United Kingdom certainly needs the USA. After the dumbfuckers among us voted for Brexit, and the subsequent underlying EU disdain towards us, we’re a bit of a much bigger isolated target without the USA. We need them.
That comforting NATO “feel” doesn’t exist anymore.
Hr's not wrong - it all fits in with what is written in Revelationsmarko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:54 pmThe UK could definitely defend itself in many situations. But for full security and strategic deterrence, especially against more global threats, it benefits from (and arguably needs) its alliance with the US. Especially post Brexit.
And this from AI...., "UK Nuclear Deterrent: The UK’s nuclear missiles (Trident) are carried on UK subs, but the missile tech is leased from the US."
Ultimately correct though. Should there ever be a "teaming up" scenario of the reds, (like my Dad seems to think is prophesised in the Big Book) then its all a bit screwed anyway.
LMAO!!! Would’ve put my mortgage on you being a leaver!Blue Wilf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:42 pmAs opposed to the dumbfucker remoaners amongst us who still cannot accept a democratic vote 9 years after the event? The EU is doing brilliantly isn't it... puts Trump issues into perspective when some people still want to be run remotely by the real EU...marko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 11:39 amThe United Kingdom certainly needs the USA. After the dumbfuckers among us voted for Brexit, and the subsequent underlying EU disdain towards us, we’re a bit of a much bigger isolated target without the USA. We need them.
That comforting NATO “feel” doesn’t exist anymore.![]()
Glad to be of service and your mortgage is secure! Just glad I don't have one any more, when it would be at the behest of all of the global idiots in charge of the asylum!marko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:43 pmLMAO!!! Would’ve put my mortgage on you being a leaver!Blue Wilf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:42 pmAs opposed to the dumbfucker remoaners amongst us who still cannot accept a democratic vote 9 years after the event? The EU is doing brilliantly isn't it... puts Trump issues into perspective when some people still want to be run remotely by the real EU...marko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 11:39 amThe United Kingdom certainly needs the USA. After the dumbfuckers among us voted for Brexit, and the subsequent underlying EU disdain towards us, we’re a bit of a much bigger isolated target without the USA. We need them.
That comforting NATO “feel” doesn’t exist anymore.![]()
![]()
![]()
Did you cash in all your crypto and pay the mortgage off?!Blue Wilf wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 3:48 pmGlad to be of service and your mortgage is secure! Just glad I don't have one any more, when it would be at the behest of all of the global idiots in charge of the asylum!![]()
No - I bet on McKenna making no changes to his game plan and remarkably, the bookies thought a miracle would happen as it was a 'process' - paid it all off nicely...!marko69 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 5:00 pmDid you cash in all your crypto and pay the mortgage off?!![]()
THAT MENTALITY is fact , deal with it or don't. America once helped you keep your country. remember that ?The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 5:26 amlol typical American mentality, the whole world revolves around and needs the USA. Actually, it doesn't.MMJR67 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:33 pmNATO , COME ON . Without the US , GOOD LUCK.The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:50 am
Yes, but the US is not alone in having bases all over the world - many countries choose to operate military bases across the globe for security reasons. But they are content to have their base and leave the running of the country housing that base to that country's government - unlike the US who seems to think it has the God-given right to take anything it wants. It's obvious that Russia and China are a threat to the rest of the world, and NATO was doing a pretty good job of being in the way of that happening until Trump's ego got in the way and he decided that it would be he that was the saviour of the world.
It's true that US presence played a small part in speeding up the end of WW2, but nowhere near the contribution that was made by Russia.
Not forgetting the Free French movement, the Dutch, and the Poles. And of course, it was Russia marching on Berlin that caused Hitler to take the cowards way out and ultimately led to the fall of the Nazis.marko69 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 10:26 amThink the biggest contribution was the Russian winter. That alone killed more German soldiers than gunfire. If the Netflix Nazi Germany documentaries are accurate that is.
Can you imagine it though. If all those guys, be them British, Russian or American had failed? ——>>> we’d have been goose-stepping to School like Basil Fawlty and Seig Heiling Elon Musk style.
As long as it is only militarily aligning with Europe, then it's WORD from me!Ricco wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 2:17 pm“You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, only after they've tried everything else.” — Winston Churchill
Whilst being eternally grateful towards every country that fought and made sacrifices in WW2 (and every war against an aggressor), if it's being waved in my face... I would retort by saying that only 0.3% of the horrendous war death toll were Americans in Europe. It's not fair to limp in late during a conflict, after 25 million Russians (and the weather) had decimated the Nazi forces, and claim to be some omnipotent saviour of the World.
I would also point out that there are 600 million Europeans and 335 million Americans on this planet. When you count the other allies like Canada, Aus, Japan, who will turn their backs on the US if the US continues down this path... then the US will soon find out that it needs the world more than vice versa, despite what they think. Yes the US is a rich country, but not when the world stops buying it's tech and weaponry. The country is a mess... drugs, guns, medical care, education, inequality, it's all completely woeful compared to other 'developed' nations in nearly every metric. Perhaps they should focus on themselves for a while, rather than blaming the world for their problems and telling everyone else how to run their business, the arrogance is astonishing. But then I guess most of maga have never travelled abroad and set foot in civilised lands.
Militarily who is going to want to try and invade the UK? No one, (apart from Trump perhaps), so our military is for European protection/stability and world stability/UK influence/reputation. We do not need the US, we should align with Europe, we share more culture and values with them (despite the language differences). Until the US can prove itself again, it can be on it's own. The damage it has done to it's own reputation in such a short time is phenomenal. Sadly that means China, Ukraine and Israel all have far worse prognosis than they did 6 months ago. But I guess everything I've just written is Biden's fault?
WORD WORD WORD. I guess you need to be an alien living in the US to be able to get the best perspectiveRicco wrote: ↑Tue Apr 22, 2025 2:17 pm“You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing, only after they've tried everything else.” — Winston Churchill
Whilst being eternally grateful towards every country that fought and made sacrifices in WW2 (and every war against an aggressor), if it's being waved in my face... I would retort by saying that only 0.3% of the horrendous war death toll were Americans in Europe. It's not fair to limp in late during a conflict, after 25 million Russians (and the weather) had decimated the Nazi forces, and claim to be some omnipotent saviour of the World.
I would also point out that there are 600 million Europeans and 335 million Americans on this planet. When you count the other allies like Canada, Aus, Japan, who will turn their backs on the US if the US continues down this path... then the US will soon find out that it needs the world more than vice versa, despite what they think. Yes the US is a rich country, but not when the world stops buying it's tech and weaponry. The country is a mess... drugs, guns, medical care, education, inequality, it's all completely woeful compared to other 'developed' nations in nearly every metric. Perhaps they should focus on themselves for a while, rather than blaming the world for their problems and telling everyone else how to run their business, the arrogance is astonishing. But then I guess most of maga have never travelled abroad and set foot in civilised lands.
Militarily who is going to want to try and invade the UK? No one, (apart from Trump perhaps), so our military is for European protection/stability and world stability/UK influence/reputation. We do not need the US, we should align with Europe, we share more culture and values with them (despite the language differences). Until the US can prove itself again, it can be on it's own. The damage it has done to it's own reputation in such a short time is phenomenal. Sadly that means China, Ukraine and Israel all have far worse prognosis than they did 6 months ago. But I guess everything I've just written is Biden's fault?
surely that's an insult to farts?
I appreciate the history lesson. Another question: I’ve argued with many people about the origin of football. Many latinos or hispanics tell me they invented futbol. But from my recollections, football was in fact invented in medieval England when a villain had his head chopped off and the town’s people kicked his/her head around town. Acknowledging that you’re one of odious proportions, would you agree with my assessment? Oops, I just trumped! Seriously though, surely football wasn’t invented by those Mexicans or whoever? Can we at least claim football?The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 8:25 amsurely that's an insult to farts?
But you are correct, since the mid 15th century the word Trump has been used in England as a synonym for a fart, particularly an extremely noisy fart. Nostradamus, eat your heart out.
As long ago as 300BC, a crude form of football was played in China with a leather ball that had to be kicked into a hole. Since then there have been crude forms involving kicking a ball in many countries over the world, and I have read about the incident in medieval England you describe.ITFC2024 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 10:53 pmI appreciate the history lesson. Another question: I’ve argued with many people about the origin of football. Many latinos or hispanics tell me they invented futbol. But from my recollections, football was in fact invented in medieval England when a villain had his head chopped off and the town’s people kicked his/her head around town. Acknowledging that you’re one of odious proportions, would you agree with my assessment? Oops, I just trumped! Seriously though, surely football wasn’t invented by those Mexicans or whoever? Can we at least claim football?The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Wed Apr 23, 2025 8:25 amsurely that's an insult to farts?
But you are correct, since the mid 15th century the word Trump has been used in England as a synonym for a fart, particularly an extremely noisy fart. Nostradamus, eat your heart out.
Interesting, so the Chinese invented footgolf!The Odious Mr Rossi wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 12:43 amAs long ago as 300BC, a crude form of football was played in China with a leather ball that had to be kicked into a hole.