Page 1 of 1
Who Would YOU let gol!!!!
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:14 pm
by sirbobby
Southampton need players
Newcastle too
Norwich as well
West Brom & Bolton in need
What if they come in for Some of our players???
The prices are rough Guides... They could be argued till the cowes come home!!!!
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:16 pm
by Rach
Out of those 5, its def Miller. He's a good player, but I think he'd be the easiest to replace.
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:18 pm
by sirbobby
Rach wrote:Out of those 5, its def Miller. He's a good player, but I think he'd be the easiest to replace.
Yes I agree... I could see him playing for Saints too.
But saints do need a Striker like Kuqi to show the rest of the team how to work!!!!
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:18 pm
by Dazza
De Vos, 2m for a player his age.... goodbye!
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:55 pm
by Sarah18
Dazza wrote:De Vos, 2m for a player his age.... goodbye!
yeah i agree, not playin that well either, i don't think
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:26 pm
by Frankie
I wouldnt let any of them go and shove counago in there direction instead!!
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 6:28 pm
by Phil
Miller, no way he is worth 1.5 million. as good as he is we could replace him for 1.5mil easily
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:47 pm
by curries_babe
miller
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:05 pm
by kat17
Frankie wrote:I wouldnt let any of them go and shove counago in there direction instead!!
I'd do exactly the same! Someone must want him..........surely!
bt if they didnt want Pabs id say Miller
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 9:26 am
by phily bon bon
Dazza wrote:De Vos, 2m for a player his age.... goodbye!
Ditto

Re: Who Would YOU let gol!!!!
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:53 pm
by The Odious Mr Rossi
sirbobby wrote:Southampton need players
Newcastle too
Norwich as well
West Brom & Bolton in need
What if they come in for Some of our players???
The prices are rough Guides... They could be argued till the cowes come home!!!!
Cobblers!!!!! Miller and De vos are not worth 1.5 million plus together in today's market, let alone each. Get real!!!!
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:06 pm
by Luke
All those prices except the one on Bent are way off target....
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:25 pm
by sirbobby
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:35 pm
by Luke
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:43 pm
by sirbobby
I dont put the Ipswich as AVERAGE.... they are the best side in the Division and players like SHEFKI, DE-VOS, NAYLOR, BENT, CURRIE are not Average... they are Talented Footballers capable of becoming Premiership Stars!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:48 pm
by Luke
sirbobby wrote:
I dont put the Ipswich as AVERAGE.... they are the best side in the Division and players like SHEFKI, DE-VOS, NAYLOR, BENT, CURRIE are not Average... they are Talented Footballers capable of becoming Premiership Stars!!!!!!!!!!!
The two on your list De Vos and Miller Average..... Look youve been picking arguments all week about time you gave it a rest i think! stop arguing for the sake of arguing !

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:01 pm
by sirbobby
This is what I put ... I was trying to see what people thought about who they would let go...
But that did'nt prove to be the case as every one questioned the value's I put!!!
Thats Forum's for ya!!!!!!!!
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:49 pm
by The Odious Mr Rossi
sirbobby wrote:This is what I put ... I was trying to see what people thought about who they would let go...
But that did'nt prove to be the case as every one questioned the value's I put!!!
Thats Forum's for ya!!!!!!!!
Trouble is - the ridiculous values you put on players entirely defeated the object of your post. Had you have been more realistic, maybe people would have responded in the way you wanted.
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2004 5:05 pm
by Dubai Blue
Its pretty clear that nobody is going to offer anything like what we think they are worth to us for any of these guys except perhaps Bent. As someone (Toby ?) said in another thread since we're playing well as a team the actual prices for these guys would never reflect their value to us, only the depressed state of the market compared to a few years ago.