Tractor-Boys.com

An easy one for me but what do you think??

only watched 1st half. I think Sito was the best!

The guy is top class and despite the scoreline he didnt put a foot wrong, he has everything!! Can use both feet, perfect passing, great vision, great timing, gets forward at every opertunity and gives 110%

Paul

Sito, didn't do anything special, but didn't do anything wrong either.

Got to be Sito without a doubt.

Sito followed by Currie in the first half, not the one who came out for the second.

That was the first time I have seen Sito and I am very impressed with his composure and touch a real asset to the club.

No one

Wilnis was probably my MOTM bearing in mind he had to look after the defence on his own, or Sito.

Sito is Quality.

What the hell! Sito played well did what i expect of a defender! But Darren Currie was the only thing that kept us gowing all game! Jim created NOTHING same with Horlock Garvan created little too then he was taken off. Definatly Currie.

P.S i think Lewis does an offical MOTM thread after everygame to tie in with his match report. Maybe from now on we should leave it to him to make it. Just a idea.

Sito....IMO he has no faults to his game....he is brilliant. Currie looked good, but needs to be more accurate with his crosses....i thought he'd looked good when he was playing on the right wing in the 1st half.

Sito again dosent seem to put a foot wrong

Rach wrote:Sito....IMO he has no faults to his game....he is brilliant. Currie looked good, but needs to be more accurate with his crosses....i thought he'd looked good when he was playing on the right wing in the 1st half.

The guy put 1 cross wrong today. I was counting lol beacuse i really cant belive the stick he gets. the one cross he put wrong was with his left foot aswel after he had been moved out to the left wing. He made 34 passes i think around 28 of which made it to its target i lost count towards the end as i really was pissed off

Sito a shining light in a p*ss poor defence.

Thought Currie played well for first 30 minutes after that got dragged down to the level of those around him.

bluebird wrote:Sito a shining light in a p*ss poor defence.

Thought Currie played well for first 30 minutes after that got dragged down to the level of those around him.

horror at those words BB

essexgirl wrote:

bluebird wrote:Sito a shining light in a p*ss poor defence.

Thought Currie played well for first 30 minutes after that got dragged down to the level of those around him.

horror at those words BB

I'm still right about Richards

Sito did play- wasnt afraid to get stuck in- unlike Richards

Sito for me, he gives it 110%, he is quick, he can tackle superbly, he can win headers against defenders who are much bigger than him, he also can take players on and cross the ball. What more do we want?

As JR keeps saying, he improves with every game.

Sito, and Currie were the main two. Linked up well, and Currie is looking better than ever. Just hope it pays off.

Dazza wrote:Sito for me, he gives it 110%, he is quick, he can tackle superbly, he can win headers against defenders who are much bigger than him, he also can take players on and cross the ball. What more do we want?
As JR keeps saying, he improves with every game.

Nine more players with the same commitment

Dazza wrote:Sito for me, he gives it 110%, he is quick, he can tackle superbly, he can win headers against defenders who are much bigger than him, he also can take players on and cross the ball. What more do we want?
As JR keeps saying, he improves with every game.

For JM to retire. I know you lot think he is great but there is alot of fans round me who are saying his time is up.

bluebird wrote:

essexgirl wrote:

bluebird wrote:Sito a shining light in a p*ss poor defence.

Thought Currie played well for first 30 minutes after that got dragged down to the level of those around him.

horror at those words BB

I'm still right about Richards

Yep he was crap no other words can discribe him. Well there is but Dazza would tell me off if i put them on this board.

Thing is though, everyone says that Jim is past it, but as soon as he misses a game we look even worse!

Jus wrote:Thing is though, everyone says that Jim is past it, but as soon as he misses a game we look even worse!

To me it looked like he sufferd playing 2 games in 3 days. Maybe we should have rested him and brought him on with 15/20 to go ?

essexgirl wrote:

Dazza wrote:Sito for me, he gives it 110%, he is quick, he can tackle superbly, he can win headers against defenders who are much bigger than him, he also can take players on and cross the ball. What more do we want?
As JR keeps saying, he improves with every game.

For JM to retire. I know you lot think he is great but there is alot of fans round me who are saying his time is up.

Jim contributed very little today - is he Currie in disguise

Luke wrote:

Jus wrote:Thing is though, everyone says that Jim is past it, but as soon as he misses a game we look even worse!

To me it looked like he sufferd playing 2 games in 3 days. Maybe we should have rested him and brought him on with 15/20 to go ?

He's a crap sub tho......

How can you criticise Currie with a midfield of Horlock,Westlake and Jim

Rach wrote:

Luke wrote:

Jus wrote:Thing is though, everyone says that Jim is past it, but as soon as he misses a game we look even worse!

To me it looked like he sufferd playing 2 games in 3 days. Maybe we should have rested him and brought him on with 15/20 to go ?

He's a crap sub tho......

I dunno Rach, he could use that pace of his!!

tim_itfc wrote:

Rach wrote:

Luke wrote: To me it looked like he sufferd playing 2 games in 3 days. Maybe we should have rested him and brought him on with 15/20 to go ?

He's a crap sub tho......

I dunno Rach, he could use that pace of his!!

Aye, the defenders will be thinkin sh*t here he comes

sorry but how can you have a MOTM when your team losses 4-nil? frankly the only person who had a good game was dave williams, called upon once and got wilnus back in the game!