Page 1 of 1
MOM vs Reading
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:18 am
by McDonna29
Lewis Price, that's what the EADT says this morning. Agree with that?
They say he didn't put a foot wrong, but IMO (maybe wrongly) I thought he could of (and probably should of) got to the ball before anyone else in the lead up to Reading's first.
MOM for me would probably be Sito purely for the fact that he never really gave up and was chasing the ball down until the final whistle.
Re: MOM vs Reading
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:26 am
by Mark18
sito just cause as u said he din't give up
no1 really stood out in all honesty as sum1 usually does in a result like this.
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 8:50 am
by Earl Blue
I have voted for Sito. The rest of the team (in my opinion) should hang their heads in shame.
I mean how the effin hell can EADT give a MOTM award to someone who has let in 3 goals.. I am sorry Joe should not be extending contracts to
unproven players and in Lewis Prices case I guess it was as someone else
mentioned to me, down to the fact that perhaps Lewis will get a price tag on his head as he now has a cp for Wales.
Pathetic thinking again in my opinion.
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:54 am
by essexgirl
I voted other. Those being the Town fans who paid to watch such a pityful performance.
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:56 am
by Earl Blue
essexgirl wrote:I voted other. Those being the Town fans who paid to watch such a pityful performance.
Even you moved faster when I tried to grab ya last night gal.
xx
Re: MOM vs Reading
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:56 am
by Dazza
McDonna25 wrote:Lewis Price, that's what the EADT says this morning. Agree with that?
Totally disagree. What rubbish the EADT writes. He was at fault for the first goal as he was totally stuck to his line and there were other chances were he just did nothing.
I personally dont rate him at all.
Re: MOM vs Reading
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 9:59 am
by Earl Blue
Dazza wrote:McDonna25 wrote:Lewis Price, that's what the EADT says this morning. Agree with that?
Totally disagree. What rubbish the EADT writes. He was at fault for the first goal as he was totally stuck to his line and there were other chances were he just did nothing.
I personally dont rate him at all.
I agree with you on that Dazza..
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:18 am
by Rach
Williams for me...closely followed by Sito. Apart from that, the whole team were poor IMO
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:22 am
by Ojc
Naylor, then Sito for me.
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:56 am
by Gaz
Steve Sidwell
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 12:18 pm
by budgiebasher
Williams as he had a shot on target
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:01 pm
by ITFC10
Sito
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:03 pm
by Dazza
budgiebasher wrote:Williams as he had a shot on target
Thought it was Forster... we didnt have 2 did we?
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:32 pm
by Bluebird
Gaz wrote:Steve Sidwell
I agree
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:39 pm
by Phil
Horlock was quality! I never saw him do anything wrong then again I saw him do nothing right thinking about it he done nothing atall.
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:46 pm
by budgiebasher
Dazza wrote:budgiebasher wrote:Williams as he had a shot on target
Thought it was Forster... we didnt have 2 did we?
It could have been Forster, looked like Williams who took the shot what gently chipped straight into the keepers hands.