Another injury

Gaz · Post by **Gaz** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:03 pm

If it doesn't rain it pours

Royle has just said on the radio McEveley will be out for upto a month!

The Gaffer · Post by **The Gaffer** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:03 pm

good hes sh*te any way!!!

ippers · Post by **ippers** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:04 pm

good hes sh*te any way!!!

yeah bring back Unsworth!

budgiebasher · Post by **budgiebasher** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:05 pm

Just makes another excuse for Royle when we lose.

Although that'll probably mean Richards having to go to left back, oooh the confidence

Gaz · Post by **Gaz** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:07 pm

I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards

Frankie · Post by **Frankie** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:08 pm

No Not Richards, anythgin but that

He plays sooo much better in Midfield, is we're losing, no its just too painfull to think about

The Gaffer · Post by **The Gaffer** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:09 pm

Gaz wrote:I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards

i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlock

ippers · Post by **ippers** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:09 pm

Well, with my sig ill support Richards wherever he plays

Gaz · Post by **Gaz** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:11 pm

bigfatjoes wrote:
Gaz wrote:I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards
i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlock

Who would you play at left back then?

Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.

Frankie · Post by **Frankie** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:12 pm

I used to think our defense was poor, then i realised it's just non exsistent

Mark18 · Post by **Mark18** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:18 pm

Frankie wrote:I used to think our defense was poor, then i realised it's just non exsistent

our defence is non existant apart frm sito at the best of times

The Gaffer · Post by **The Gaffer** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:19 pm

Gaz wrote:
bigfatjoes wrote:
Gaz wrote:I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards
i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlock
Who would you play at left back then?

Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.

Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!

Gaz · Post by **Gaz** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:22 pm

bigfatjoes wrote:
Gaz wrote:
bigfatjoes wrote: i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlock
Who would you play at left back then?

Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.
Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!

Fab will be banned for 3 games though by the looks of things, I agree with the Currie part he can't even run let alone defend.

Frankie · Post by **Frankie** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:26 pm

Gaz wrote:
bigfatjoes wrote:
Gaz wrote: Who would you play at left back then?

Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.
Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!
Fab will be banned for 3 games though by the looks of things, I agree with the Currie part he can't even run let alone defend.

he still doing that i'll run while i'm in my own half and then stop thing of his?

budgiebasher · Post by **budgiebasher** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:33 pm

bigfatjoes wrote:Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!

Lat time i saw Fabian at left back against Reading he was absolutely awful, it seems he's lost some speed and ability and no longer offers us muich as a full back. I personally thought Horlock played alright at left back, i've certainly seen Richards play worst there.

Post by **Dazza** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:01 pm

Look, we've seen what our full strength side does against Reading, I certainly dont want that 11 playing together again.

Injuries are good, it means things get shaken up a bit, people play new postions and we have youngsters fighting for a first place (what better time!).

Roll on the injuries... bring on the youngsters... onwards and upwards!