Another injury
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:03 pm
If it doesn't rain it pours
Royle has just said on the radio McEveley will be out for upto a month!

Royle has just said on the radio McEveley will be out for upto a month!
Ipswich Town Football Club Supporters Forum
http://tractor-boys.com/forum/
good hes sh*te any way!!!
i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlockGaz wrote:I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards
Who would you play at left back then?bigfatjoes wrote:i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlockGaz wrote:I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards
our defence is non existant apart frm sito at the best of timesFrankie wrote:I used to think our defense was poor, then i realised it's just non exsistent
Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!Gaz wrote:Who would you play at left back then?bigfatjoes wrote:i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlockGaz wrote:I'd rather have McEveley at left back than Richards
Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.
Fab will be banned for 3 games though by the looks of things, I agree with the Currie part he can't even run let alone defend.bigfatjoes wrote:Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!Gaz wrote:Who would you play at left back then?bigfatjoes wrote: i honestly belive and i know our defence was crap before hand, but since hes come in, its got worse to the state were school boy defending can be used! if its not goin his way he gives up, he bottles challanges and doesnt offer anything goin forward. id be happy with any cept horlock
Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.
he still doing that i'll run while i'm in my own half and then stop thing of his?Gaz wrote:Fab will be banned for 3 games though by the looks of things, I agree with the Currie part he can't even run let alone defend.bigfatjoes wrote:Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!Gaz wrote: Who would you play at left back then?
Richards has no bottle in defence too, he's better in midfield. Horlock did ok in a position that he doesn't like playing in.
Lat time i saw Fabian at left back against Reading he was absolutely awful, it seems he's lost some speed and ability and no longer offers us muich as a full back. I personally thought Horlock played alright at left back, i've certainly seen Richards play worst there.bigfatjoes wrote:Fab if not suspended. if not fab then richards but have some one infront of him who can protect him not currie!