Mcevely
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:23 pm
Mcevely told he wont be getting contract with TOWN.
tonights,EVENING STAR.
tonights,EVENING STAR.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:30 pm
Don't think that will bother many fans LOL
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:39 pm
Nah, hes not good enough to play for us.
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:48 pm
Thank the Lord for small mercies I say 
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:53 pm
well I for one am pleased with this ....IMO Scott Barron is twice the footballer of McEverly !
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:52 pm
After his appearance at Luton I can honestly say thank god for that. 
Although I have to say that before he was injured he played some decent footie.
Although I have to say that before he was injured he played some decent footie.Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:07 pm
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!! F-ING YESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! best news all week!!
as you can see wasnt his biggest fan!!
as you can see wasnt his biggest fan!!
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:13 pm
before he re-joined he was a player I wouldn't have minded being in our squad but since re-joining he has been truely shocking.
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:25 pm
I think you have to give credit to JR here. We have been saying that McEverley was a 'favourite' but now it seems he was given some games and finally JR made an honest appraisal.
Good decision. He did play some tidy footie early on but we didn't see much of that recently did we.
Good decision. He did play some tidy footie early on but we didn't see much of that recently did we.
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:50 pm
Got to give BFJ some credit here!!! He bought the lad in,thought he could do a job and failed.....The right decision made,there are better players out there who need discovering.
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:35 pm
Great news for once 
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 6:11 am
It better be true, everytime I saw him play he was horrendous.
If he was'nt good enough for Gillingham why would Joe think he would be good enough for us? Barron is much better than him.
If he was'nt good enough for Gillingham why would Joe think he would be good enough for us? Barron is much better than him.
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:27 pm
How comeloudnproud wrote:Got to give BFJ some credit here!!! He bought the lad in,thought he could do a job and failed.....The right decision made,there are better players out there who need discovering.
Took him 6 months to see what most of us could see in 6 minutes
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:30 pm
Although you cant judge a player in 6 minutes, unless your name is Mark Fish...rossi wrote:How come
Took him 6 months to see what most of us could see in 6 minutes
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:47 pm
I dunno why Joe bothered recalling him today if he's not gonna be kept on....he was awful, lacking pace, and his passing/hoofing was all over the place.....im just glad we're not signing him....
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:51 pm
Can someone please explain why McEverly was bought back today to play 90mins of crap instead of Wilnis !!!! because it beats me .... there must be a good reason SURELYRach wrote:I dunno why Joe bothered recalling him today if he's not gonna be kept on....he was awful, lacking pace, and his passing/hoofing was all over the place.....im just glad we're not signing him....
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:19 pm
Jay McEveley aka Wayne "HOOF" Brown was bloody awful today, I hope we never see him in a Town shirt again 
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:32 pm
I still can't understand that Nicky. As we were discussing during the game, McEverley had no reason to try. He is not being kept on at the club according to the original post. So why oh why didn't Joe play Fabian who we all know is totally committed to the club?1978greats wrote:Can someone please explain why McEverly was bought back today to play 90mins of crap instead of Wilnis !!!! because it beats me .... there must be a good reason SURELYRach wrote:I dunno why Joe bothered recalling him today if he's not gonna be kept on....he was awful, lacking pace, and his passing/hoofing was all over the place.....im just glad we're not signing him....
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:43 pm
On TWTD they are suggesting that Fab was 'rested' !! well IMO he is one player that doesn't need to be 'rested'...he's one of the fittest players we have mainly due to his very strick diet and fitness plan..... bloody madness if you ask meBlue Susie wrote:I still can't understand that Nicky. As we were discussing during the game, McEverley had no reason to try. He is not being kept on at the club according to the original post. So why oh why didn't Joe play Fabian who we all know is totally committed to the club?1978greats wrote:Can someone please explain why McEverly was bought back today to play 90mins of crap instead of Wilnis !!!! because it beats me .... there must be a good reason SURELYRach wrote:I dunno why Joe bothered recalling him today if he's not gonna be kept on....he was awful, lacking pace, and his passing/hoofing was all over the place.....im just glad we're not signing him....
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:30 pm
Shame he has been dog sh*t most of the season1978greats wrote:On TWTD they are suggesting that Fab was 'rested' !! well IMO he is one player that doesn't need to be 'rested'...he's one of the fittest players we have mainly due to his very strick diet and fitness plan..... bloody madness if you ask meBlue Susie wrote:I still can't understand that Nicky. As we were discussing during the game, McEverley had no reason to try. He is not being kept on at the club according to the original post. So why oh why didn't Joe play Fabian who we all know is totally committed to the club?1978greats wrote: Can someone please explain why McEverly was bought back today to play 90mins of crap instead of Wilnis !!!! because it beats me .... there must be a good reason SURELY
Maybe he can blame the diet ? Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:44 am
Dog sh*t all season!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!Luke wrote:Shame he has been dog sh*t most of the season1978greats wrote:On TWTD they are suggesting that Fab was 'rested' !! well IMO he is one player that doesn't need to be 'rested'...he's one of the fittest players we have mainly due to his very strick diet and fitness plan..... bloody madness if you ask meBlue Susie wrote: I still can't understand that Nicky. As we were discussing during the game, McEverley had no reason to try. He is not being kept on at the club according to the original post. So why oh why didn't Joe play Fabian who we all know is totally committed to the club?
Your having a laugh Luke....i hope
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:20 am
Wilnis plays one good game every 6 on average. If it wasnt for the fact he "Is a blue" and "he hates norwich" then i think people would and should give him a much rawer deal. He has been living on that Norwich performnce IMO good squad player but way over the hill. No team with an average 35/36 year old fullback in there team will ever be challlanging, Same goes for NaylorMissblue wrote:Dog sh*t all season!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!Luke wrote:Shame he has been dog sh*t most of the season1978greats wrote: On TWTD they are suggesting that Fab was 'rested' !! well IMO he is one player that doesn't need to be 'rested'...he's one of the fittest players we have mainly due to his very strick diet and fitness plan..... bloody madness if you ask me
Your having a laugh Luke....i hope
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:23 am
Have to agree with you Luke!!!
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:27 am
Bloody hell! I wasnt expecting anyone to actually agree with me!loudnproud wrote:Have to agree with you Luke!!!
I think next season Wilnis as a reserve centre back will do fine, He shouldnt play full back ever again he cant cut it. Hasnt for the last 2 seasons IMO since that game at wolves where Lee Naylor skinned him time and time again
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:43 am
Fabian will make a reliable bench player.When things are tough,you know that a player who wares the colours with passion is going to give you his all,even if it is only for 20 mins a game.