Page 1 of 1
Darts, anyone?
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 2:15 pm
by number 9
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:28 pm
by ashfordblue

This Man is in deep poo poo once the results of the investigation into world cup corruption payments by Qatar and possibly Russia are revealed, and its about time this little worm was hung drawn & quartered, and booted out of FIFA plus all his cronies, and start again with a squeaky clean ex players running it, I bet this little sh*t gets away with it.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 6:35 pm
by Bluemike
I quite like him.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:52 am
by number 9
I agree with you Ash. No way in hell should the WC go to Qatar. And England should have got the nod over Russia. He stalled on goal line replays. Blatter is trying to polticize football. No way in hell Qatar should get the Cup! WC should be reserved for football nations. Triple 20, your throw.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:40 pm
by Floors
When I saw darts mentioned I thought we were going to be treated to rendition of "its raining". But seeing that picture would still have me reacing for a set of arrows.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:25 am
by arana peligrosa
number 9 wrote:I agree with you Ash. No way in hell should the WC go to Qatar. And England should have got the nod over Russia. He stalled on goal line replays. Blatter is trying to polticize football. No way in hell Qatar should get the Cup! WC should be reserved for football nations. Triple 20, your throw.
It was an asinine decision right off the bat that was void of logic although Russia was a more rational decision. You got some adequate stadia and a final event in Moscow would be good enough.
The English held the European Championships as recently as 1996 so that's one reason why they may have been overlooked. I think Spain again (last witnessed '82) would've been a good pick, but not in favor of co-hosts as we have seen in recent years. I.E. Japan / Korea. I think a single nation works best for events of this nature.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:55 am
by The Don
The bloke is a thunderc*nt, no more needs to be said
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 9:17 am
by Bluemike
Bit harsh.

Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 5:56 pm
by number 9
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 6:48 pm
by marko69
The Don wrote:The bloke is a thunderc*nt, no more needs to be said
If he had lived 85 million years ago......, would he have been a Thundercuntasaurus Rex?
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 9:33 pm
by BLUEBLOOD
The only way football is going to move forward if he goes but no one is able to stand up against him.
He seems to have a hold over most footballing nations who keep reappointing him .
How long did it take him to bring in the modern day goal line technology ? Years .
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 3:38 am
by number 9
The Don wrote:The bloke is a thunderc*nt, no more needs to be said
I think I'll use that word Don, if you don't mind; it describes my ex-wife perfectly.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:29 pm
by marko69
number 9 wrote:The Don wrote:The bloke is a thunderc*nt, no more needs to be said
I think I'll use that word Don, if you don't mind; it describes my ex-wife perfectly.
Dare you to use it today. That'll be two ex wives.
Re: Darts, anyone?
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2014 5:22 pm
by number 9
marko69 wrote:number 9 wrote:The Don wrote:The bloke is a thunderc*nt, no more needs to be said
I think I'll use that word Don, if you don't mind; it describes my ex-wife perfectly.
Dare you to use it today. That'll be two ex wives.
No more wives, Marko. One was enough for me, Cor!