Bluemike wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2024 6:36 am
I still want someone to explain just why we didn't have the nous to shut up shop for a mere 5 minutes prior to HT which would almost certainly have ensured the win, instead we remained all cavalier and gung ho and just threw all the excellent work away.
I did sort of offer my explanation to why we conceded the first goal (which in turn no doubt got Brentford's tails up and us on the ropes for the 2nd)....
Another thing which nobody has really picked up on is the injury to Ogbene. Is it any coincidence that Brentford's first goal came down our right hand side and the player I believe Ogbene would have been picking up was heavily involved. There was just 9 minutes between Burns coming on, without a warm up and that goal.
Yes, it was soul destroying as just for once we looked like we may be onto something good. Had Szmodics scored to make it 3-0 in our 'gung ho' approach (and I believe there were credible chances for both Burgess & Davis in that time too?) then many would be lording it up at how a much changed Town side had overcome the odds.
This is what makes football an exciting (and frustrating) sport. It's not to clockwork, goals come at any time. Dyche at Everton - up 2-0 at home to Bournemouth in 87th minute, ended up losing 2-3. Arsenal 2-0 up at half time against the Foxes, only to let the away side draw level, then looking to have secured an amazing point, the Foxes conceded twice in extra time. Probably the harshest example where a team were punished for attacking was Brighton on Saturday. 2-0 up in the 85th minute, Wolves pull a goal back and then at 2-1, Brighton pile forward on the counter with a 4 v 1 situation, looking almost certain to score had the player in possession not found the one Wolves defender between him and his 3 unmarked team mates. The result, Wolves then have an overload and score an equaliser at the death.
For me it doesn't matter when any of those goal above were scored as such, but it shows just what football is. You are totally right in wanting better game management at that stage in our game, and yes maybe a more experienced player could have shown a cooler head. We know Kieran (here you go Blue Wilf when you say we haven't adapted

) has spoken about changing from the team who were hell bent on scoring again if they went behind (in the lower leagues) to a team that needed to manage the game better to stop successive goals being conceded (I guess there is an argument to the flip side of this which does give credence to your argument BM

).
I am going to defend KM, he still has a side which is vastly under experienced, riddled with key injuries, one which is learning about each other. While that argument will eventually wear thin, we are still on a harsh learning curve. He will make mistakes but I secretly hope that he does go on to prove his doubters wrong.
One final point; We had a midfield pairing who have not played any minutes together, even if they are experienced players. Cajuste would not have been thrust in to start had it not been for Taylors injury. A CB pairing who had (I believe) also not played alongside each other, but who probably were the 2 best individuals to deal with Brentford's aerial threat. Also we had Clarke starting his first game and sadly looking out of place at times.