Should we have accepted a £3m bid for Darren?
Moderators: marko69, Bluemike, Charnwood
-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
Should we have accepted a £3m bid for Darren?
£3 million is a lorra wonga.
But Bent is only senior striker who seems to have a hope of scoring well for us this season.
Difficult decision.
But Bent is only senior striker who seems to have a hope of scoring well for us this season.
Difficult decision.
-
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 12:30 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 10333
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:07 am
- Location: Herts
- squiz18
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Felixstowe /Southampton
I went for no not at all , hes not for sale
If i ludicrous amount of money was offered then yes , but i believe him and bowditch will fire us back to the premiership this season. If the money was definitely going to be invested into the team so we could buy a few new players , not a few loanees ( and not permanantly sign dinning ! ) like ashton and a midfield player then i think that would benifit the team. Without these new players then losing Bent would not offer any gain to Ipswich Town other than 3 mil off our debts which i dont think is worth it.
Selling him would also revive the " sheepy out " thing , which we dont need at this momment in time.
My gut reaction when i read " Bent offer turned down " was thank god , we need him and he shouldnt be for sale
If i ludicrous amount of money was offered then yes , but i believe him and bowditch will fire us back to the premiership this season. If the money was definitely going to be invested into the team so we could buy a few new players , not a few loanees ( and not permanantly sign dinning ! ) like ashton and a midfield player then i think that would benifit the team. Without these new players then losing Bent would not offer any gain to Ipswich Town other than 3 mil off our debts which i dont think is worth it.
Selling him would also revive the " sheepy out " thing , which we dont need at this momment in time.
My gut reaction when i read " Bent offer turned down " was thank god , we need him and he shouldnt be for sale
- toby
- Posts: 11682
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 2:09 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 12:30 pm
- Contact:
- toby
- Posts: 11682
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 2:09 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
- Contact:
Surely there's not another Shefki out there *shudders at the thought*Jus wrote:No, I just believe he's a good player, his record's even better than Bent's amd I just think he's the kind of player we could do with to replace Bent if he goes.
My worry is Royle will sign some old past it striker or another Shefki which is not what we need.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 2:19 pm
- Location: chelmsford, and north lower
ashton as class act. always liked the guy.. but still he would be around 1 million to bring in anyway. also would crewe wanna part with a potentinal championship contenderm or hold on for a lesser prem club. there in exactlly the same suituation as us.. basically realy on the one stricker for a huge amount of goals a season.chrisavo wrote:Didn't Ashton score a cracker against us last year too? He is an awesome player.
- Riviera
- Posts: 22224
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 10:07 am
- Location: Chudleigh Knighton - On the edge of Dartmoor
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 12:01 pm
- Location: Northants but from Ipswich originally
-
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2004 12:01 pm
- Location: Northants but from Ipswich originally
Keep Benty no matter what the price, with Benty i believe we will get in the Prem and i would rather keep Benty and get the £10m for being in the prem than sell him for a mere £3m.
Trouble is i think Charlton are gonna improve their offer and i'm already suprised the club have turned down an offer! (for once)
Trouble is i think Charlton are gonna improve their offer and i'm already suprised the club have turned down an offer! (for once)
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:53 pm
- Location: Stratford-upon-Avon
- Contact:
Re: Should we have accepted a £3m bid for Darren?
noooooooooooooooooooo!!!! we cannot go on selling our homegrown players, it really hurts to see our own talent playing in the premiership for other clubs. I realise sometimes it is neccessary and sometimes it is even inevitable, but right now we're doing well financially and Darren has got a lot more to give this club before he moves on. In two years time he'll be worth a lot more than £3million, and by then he could be playing with us in the premeirship.
- Riviera
- Posts: 22224
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 10:07 am
- Location: Chudleigh Knighton - On the edge of Dartmoor
kuqi was an international from a fairly big club, i mean clubs such as brentford, mansfield etc....GavITFC wrote:scared to go to the lower leagues? where did we get shefki from then?riviera wrote:the problem with BFJ is hes affraid to go to the lower divisions to get players, i watch plenty of football in the lower leagues and i can assure u there are plenty of capable players there
also kuqi wouldnt get into most of the lower league teams ive seen, hes not good enough
-
- Posts: 18157
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:07 am
- Location: Bury St. Edmunds
- Phil
- Posts: 10517
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Costa Del Chelmsford
-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
We do?Blue Phil wrote:bent should stay for at least one more season. because we stand a fairly good chance of playing premiership football in 2005 and if we arent playing top league he will be worth quite bit more.
mr sheepshanks will be a very unpopular person if bent or any of the young players goes.
I think not.
- Phil
- Posts: 10517
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Costa Del Chelmsford
imho we do, tighten the defence and we'll be well on our way.Mork wrote:We do?Blue Phil wrote:bent should stay for at least one more season. because we stand a fairly good chance of playing premiership football in 2005 and if we arent playing top league he will be worth quite bit more.
mr sheepshanks will be a very unpopular person if bent or any of the young players goes.
I think not.
if our club had any sence then we should be holding out for more money cos i meen 3 million for a star like bent is a joke to me really we should be waiting for a bigger offer than that around 6-10 million cos they are offers u cant refuse but thats me i guess no less cos he is a great striker 3 million is real cheap for a great player such as darren id rather have darren than 3 million but if the money was doubled then it would need to be considered and it would be wise to let him go otherwise keep him cos he will play a important roll in maybe getting us into a top 2 place or another shot at the playoffs. watever they do dont let him go for such low money. waiting another season because this might increase his valuation.
- toby
- Posts: 11682
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 2:09 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
- Contact:
- squiz18
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Felixstowe /Southampton
Must be another initative to raise the profile of the league by making it more exciting........toby wrote:Blue Phil what is going on in your signature?Blue Phil wrote: imho we do, tighten the defence and we'll be well on our way.
We've got 10 points from 5 games and we're in 53rd position?
I know they've renamed the league but I didn't realise they'd expanded it to over 50 teams!
yea they will if they want him so bad i find it hard to believe that no1 will pay that sort of money for a quaility player like bent i meen earnshaw is worth 3.5 but he hasnt really done much had he.Gaz wrote:There's not a chance someone will pay 6 to 10 million for Bent.
its my opinion that he should be valued at 6 million or watever wether the club will sell him for less or more who knows
- Dazza
- Posts: 12611
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:48 am
- Location: London
Re: Should we have accepted a £3m bid for Darren?
No.Mork wrote:£3 million is a lorra wonga.
But Bent is only senior striker who seems to have a hope of scoring well for us this season.
Difficult decision.