Ipswich Town Vs Reading Match Day Thread
Moderators: marko69, Bluemike, Charnwood
-
- Posts: 15861
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:50 pm
- Location: Huddersfield
Ipswich Town Vs Reading Match Day Thread
Please keep all matchday comments in here
A-thankyou
A-thankyou
-
- Posts: 15861
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:50 pm
- Location: Huddersfield
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:30 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:30 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Lost already then!Fully wrote:-----------------------------L Price, ----------------------
L Sito--------- J De Vos-------------R Naylor------- J McEveley
D Currie---- G Williams--- J Juan--- K Horlock-------M Richards
---------------------S Parkin
Subs:
S Supple,
F Wilnis,
J Magilton,
N Forster,
I Westlake
4-5-1 formation
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 10:28 pm
- Location: Nawrrrich
-
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 8:50 pm
-
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 10:34 pm
- Location: London, Ontario
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 2:30 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
- tractorboydownunder
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 9:27 pm
- Location: Sydney
I was just gonna say this sounds like sh*t, I slept in for the 1st half this match, think i should have stayed in bed, r we even half competing with Reading. Is it that were that bad or r they just that good cause we sounded good on saturday.Roylemark wrote:Sounds like we are playing as sh*t as the last time we played them!Reading 17 attempts on goal we have had 2
-
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 10:34 pm
- Location: London, Ontario
-
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:42 am
- Location: Norfolk
Well Reading are one of the best teams in this league!but i thought with our home advantage we would do better,just hope we don`t do another Preston.tractorboydownunder wrote:I was just gonna say this sounds like sh*t, I slept in for the 1st half this match, think i should have stayed in bed, r we even half competing with Reading. Is it that were that bad or r they just that good cause we sounded good on saturday.Roylemark wrote:Sounds like we are playing as sh*t as the last time we played them!Reading 17 attempts on goal we have had 2
-
- Posts: 1890
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:44 pm
hmm wot to say
1st hearing the lineup you know we would have problems.
from the off they were all over us and outplayed us. they deservidly won. ipswich playin hoof ball also didn't help.
ipswich were 2nd to none , didn't show up and to me no1 really stood out, in a dire person there is usually at least one person.
no positive points to take , our 1st shot on target was the 67th minute.
joe says top 6, we're mid table this year sadly.
1st hearing the lineup you know we would have problems.
from the off they were all over us and outplayed us. they deservidly won. ipswich playin hoof ball also didn't help.
ipswich were 2nd to none , didn't show up and to me no1 really stood out, in a dire person there is usually at least one person.
no positive points to take , our 1st shot on target was the 67th minute.
joe says top 6, we're mid table this year sadly.
- Earl Blue
- Posts: 27506
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Blighty
- Contact:
- budgiebasher
- Posts: 5893
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 7:05 pm
- Location: Ipswich
4-5-1 makes no sense, Parkin as a lone striker, who hasn't scored a goal. At home we should be more adventurous, we showed Reading way too much respect from the start and it resulted in a pathetic performances, no attempt to get the ball down and play football, and on a cold November night you really do wonder why you bother with it at all.
- McDonna29
- Site Administrator
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 3:24 pm
- Location: Felixstowe
Until today I've always been of the attitude "he's the manager, he knows best" when pondering slightly dubious team selections by Royle, but after today....Earl Blue wrote:Inmy considered opinion, we were PATHETIC
And NO Reading were not good, we made them look good
a half decent Ipswich team would have held a draw against them.
Who on earth in their right mind would play Sam "ball to my feet please" Parkin as a lone striker? It's pretty obvious that's never going to work.
I can almost see the logic behind 5 across the middle, but that choice of striker IMO we looked better after reverting to 4-4-2 but still woefully inadequate. Reading didn't WIN by playing particularly well, we LOST it by playing terribly!
- phily bon bon
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 12:08 pm
- Location: Denmark
McDonna25 wrote:Until today I've always been of the attitude "he's the manager, he knows best" when pondering slightly dubious team selections by Royle, but after today....Earl Blue wrote:Inmy considered opinion, we were PATHETIC
And NO Reading were not good, we made them look good
a half decent Ipswich team would have held a draw against them.
Who on earth in their right mind would play Sam "ball to my feet please" Parkin as a lone striker? It's pretty obvious that's never going to work.
I can almost see the logic behind 5 across the middle, but that choice of striker IMO we looked better after reverting to 4-4-2 but still woefully inadequate. Reading didn't WIN by playing particularly well, we LOST it by playing terribly!
you know when your Earlship writes that ,that we are sh*te and maybe totally lost the plot.