Jaime Peters
Moderators: marko69, Bluemike, Charnwood
- squiz18
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Felixstowe /Southampton
Jaime Peters
Where has this guy gone ? He seems to have disapeared off the face of the earth. Is he injured, or just playing in the reserves ?
- essexboy21
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:25 pm
- Location: Kelvedon, Colchester.
- Dazza
- Posts: 12611
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:48 am
- Location: London
-
- Posts: 1327
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:06 pm
- Location: Clacton-on-sea
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:27 am
Re: Jaime Peters
Like I said on another topic. He's too fast, energetic and skillful, for our first team. Joe wants players Like Jim! 35 years old and absolutely no energy. lolsquiz18 wrote:Where has this guy gone ? He seems to have disapeared off the face of the earth. Is he injured, or just playing in the reserves ?
-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
Dazza - winning really isn't everything. We had nothing up front. Not one player in a striking position made any impact on the game at all. Our great white hope of Bowditch tripped over the ball twice instead of taking golden opportunities.Dazza wrote:we won... should we play peters and then lose and then all chant for JR to stay?essexboy21 wrote:I saw him on the train on the way home after the match yesterday, but I'm afraid I can't answer the question. If it's just a case of Roy;le not playing him, that's even more cause for Royle to go.
Peters is an option, why isn't he being played, no idea - if he's worse than Bowditch we should never have signed him in the first place.
- essexboy21
- Posts: 1601
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:25 pm
- Location: Kelvedon, Colchester.
So you're saying that Dean McDonald is the reason we won? Haha, and that if Peters would have played we would have lost, how can you possibly say that?!Dazza wrote:we won... should we play peters and then lose and then all chant for JR to stay?essexboy21 wrote:I saw him on the train on the way home after the match yesterday, but I'm afraid I can't answer the question. If it's just a case of Roy;le not playing him, that's even more cause for Royle to go.