Page 1 of 1

Jaime Peters

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:13 pm
by squiz18
Where has this guy gone ? He seems to have disapeared off the face of the earth. Is he injured, or just playing in the reserves ?

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:17 pm
by essexboy21
I saw him on the train on the way home after the match yesterday, but I'm afraid I can't answer the question. If it's just a case of Roy;le not playing him, that's even more cause for Royle to go.

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:25 pm
by Dazza
essexboy21 wrote:I saw him on the train on the way home after the match yesterday, but I'm afraid I can't answer the question. If it's just a case of Roy;le not playing him, that's even more cause for Royle to go.
we won... should we play peters and then lose and then all chant for JR to stay?

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:32 pm
by ippers
Why isn't he even on the bench? he has probably scored at least 6 times more than th utterly useless mcdonald has managed in the reserves :roll: I think Royle is paceaphobic or something

Re: Jaime Peters

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:07 pm
by jjlj_itfc4eva
squiz18 wrote:Where has this guy gone ? He seems to have disapeared off the face of the earth. Is he injured, or just playing in the reserves ?
Like I said on another topic. He's too fast, energetic and skillful, for our first team. Joe wants players Like Jim! 35 years old and absolutely no energy. lol

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:22 pm
by Mork
Dazza wrote:
essexboy21 wrote:I saw him on the train on the way home after the match yesterday, but I'm afraid I can't answer the question. If it's just a case of Roy;le not playing him, that's even more cause for Royle to go.
we won... should we play peters and then lose and then all chant for JR to stay?
Dazza - winning really isn't everything. We had nothing up front. Not one player in a striking position made any impact on the game at all. Our great white hope of Bowditch tripped over the ball twice instead of taking golden opportunities.

Peters is an option, why isn't he being played, no idea - if he's worse than Bowditch we should never have signed him in the first place.

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:27 pm
by Phil
all that fuss about getting him here over the summer and he doesn't even feature!

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:54 pm
by essexboy21
Dazza wrote:
essexboy21 wrote:I saw him on the train on the way home after the match yesterday, but I'm afraid I can't answer the question. If it's just a case of Roy;le not playing him, that's even more cause for Royle to go.
we won... should we play peters and then lose and then all chant for JR to stay?
So you're saying that Dean McDonald is the reason we won? Haha, and that if Peters would have played we would have lost, how can you possibly say that?!