£100k too much for Alan Lee ?

Here you can chat about everything and anything related to ITFC and other football issues. This forum also hosts the now Internationally famous TB.com ITFC match previews which contain insightful pre-match thoughts, previous highlights, news links relating to Town, form guides and other bits and pieces. Feel free to discuss meet ups/travel plans in here as well.

Moderators: Charnwood, Bluemike

hallamblue
Posts: 33336
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
Location: Ipswich Town F.C.

£100k too much for Alan Lee ?

Post by hallamblue » Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:30 pm

..here we go again ...seems like some fans (primarily on TWTD I hasten to add) are feeling that we cant have a good player cos he's only cost £100k.

Well all I can say is

...how much did we pay for Kuqi ?? - and look how he finished up playing for us !

....£3+ million dosent "guarantee goals " - ref Mr Ashton - who, IMHO has been "ordinary" at best , since he joined that bunch of misfits north of the boarder..and he hasnt exactly "progressed his career" with a £3m + transfer fee has he !

so donmt judge a book by it's cover as they dsay...lets wait anfd see what Lee can do - and dont expect it to "happen" over a couple of game seither - well I not anyway !

ippers
Posts: 1327
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Clacton-on-sea
Contact:

Post by ippers » Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:09 pm

Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO

hallamblue
Posts: 33336
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
Location: Ipswich Town F.C.

Post by hallamblue » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:10 pm

ippers wrote:Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !

Mork
Posts: 3084
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Post by Mork » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:12 pm

hallamblue wrote:
ippers wrote:Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !
He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.

User avatar
Dazza
Posts: 12611
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:48 am
Location: London

Post by Dazza » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:12 pm

Its hard to know if we're getting value for money, not sure how people can just assume...

If he scored 10 goals this season it'll be buy of the century, if he scores none it'll be 100K wasted, we'll have to wait and see.

TWTD posters are truely idiots. I go there sometimes just to lurk for a laugh, if I wanna talk about football I'll come here!

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:23 pm

Mork wrote:
hallamblue wrote:
ippers wrote:Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !
He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.
You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.

If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands :shock:

Anglo-Saxon
Posts: 4054
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am

Post by Anglo-Saxon » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:32 pm

Lewis wrote:
Mork wrote:
hallamblue wrote: agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !
He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.
You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.

If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands :shock:
He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th game :roll: :roll: :roll:

OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:35 pm

Anglo-Saxon wrote:
Lewis wrote:
Mork wrote: He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.
You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.

If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands :shock:
He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th game :roll: :roll: :roll:

OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!

Anglo-Saxon
Posts: 4054
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am

Post by Anglo-Saxon » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:37 pm

Lewis wrote:
Anglo-Saxon wrote:
Lewis wrote: You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.

If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands :shock:
He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th game :roll: :roll: :roll:

OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!

I did say "OK apart from when he was injured" :roll:

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:38 pm

Anglo-Saxon wrote:
Lewis wrote:
Anglo-Saxon wrote: He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th game :roll: :roll: :roll:

OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!

I did say "OK apart from when he was injured" :roll:
So how can you say he's scored in 4 games out of 28 then :roll:

More negative spin to make it look like he's been an awful signing?!

Fully
Posts: 15861
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Huddersfield

Post by Fully » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:39 pm

Lewis wrote:
Anglo-Saxon wrote:
Lewis wrote: You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.

If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands :shock:
He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th game :roll: :roll: :roll:

OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!
He's played 17 with 2 sub appearences scoring 5 goals with 3 yellow cards :wink: :lol:

Anglo-Saxon
Posts: 4054
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am

Post by Anglo-Saxon » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:40 pm

Just looked it up, he has played 17 plus he came on twice as a sub, thats about 19 games, so he scores every 5th game then LOL

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:41 pm

Anglo-Saxon wrote:Just looked it up, he has played 17 plus he came on twice as a sub, thats about 19 games, so he scores every 5th game then LOL
Every 4 games mate... he's scored 5 goals....

Anglo-Saxon
Posts: 4054
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am

Post by Anglo-Saxon » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:44 pm

Lewis wrote:
Anglo-Saxon wrote:Just looked it up, he has played 17 plus he came on twice as a sub, thats about 19 games, so he scores every 5th game then LOL
Every 4 games mate... he's scored 5 goals....
2 goals were in one game FFS's

OK I'll put it another way:

Sam has scored in four of the games he has played in 8) 8) 8)

User avatar
Riviera
Posts: 22224
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 10:07 am
Location: Chudleigh Knighton - On the edge of Dartmoor

Post by Riviera » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:46 pm

Parkin should be dropped for crimes against hair cuts :lol:

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:47 pm

Riviera wrote:Parkin should be dropped for crimes against hair cuts :lol:
Richard Chaplow would love a head of hair like Parkin's!!! :lol:

Mork
Posts: 3084
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Post by Mork » Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:48 pm

Lets just remember it isn't all about goals. The fans at Portman Road got on Parkins back quickly, not because they're idiots, because Parking has not looked like he is that good - poor first touch, head makes contact with ball only 1 in 30 attempts, and his flick ons and possession play look very very poor compared to our other players.

I'm still hoping he turns out good, but lets not try to paint a picture where people have decided not to back him for no reason.

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:04 pm

Mork wrote:Lets just remember it isn't all about goals. The fans at Portman Road got on Parkins back quickly, not because they're idiots, because Parking has not looked like he is that good - poor first touch, head makes contact with ball only 1 in 30 attempts, and his flick ons and possession play look very very poor compared to our other players.

I'm still hoping he turns out good, but lets not try to paint a picture where people have decided not to back him for no reason.
I'm sorry but how could he have looked good in the side we played at the start of the season? Forster constantly played 40 yards away from him so any flick ons or lay offs he did make were useless cos Forster was so far apart - not Parkin's fault.

He's said himself he's not a target man, Horlock, Magilton and the like all aimed for Parkin's head - again, not his fault.

And would you not get tense and nervous when in possession when you have 24,500 of your own fans getting on your back for doing nothing wrong?

User avatar
Aluren
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Aluren » Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:20 pm

Agreed, if people get behind him and the team plays like we did on Saturday, he'll be banging them in. Parkin is a good player, don't knock him, he's still our top scorer.

User avatar
edo_blue
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:03 pm
Location: Doncaster, YORKSHIRE

Post by edo_blue » Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:48 pm

£100,000 is a waste of money for a Rotherham reject, which is what he is. Hope he proves me wrong, but I very much doubt it :roll:

Luke

Post by Luke » Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:47 am

edo_blue wrote:£100,000 is a waste of money for a Rotherham reject, which is what he is. Hope he proves me wrong, but I very much doubt it :roll:
Completly agree, IMO we have the big target man in Parkin. We need a little nippy player, Like Leon Knight. Ive got to say i was VERY dissapointed when Royle missed out on him. But for me it just prooves my theory about Royle being inept in the transfer market in general

Lewis
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
Location: Stowmarket
Contact:

Post by Lewis » Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:56 am

Luke wrote:
edo_blue wrote:£100,000 is a waste of money for a Rotherham reject, which is what he is. Hope he proves me wrong, but I very much doubt it :roll:
Completly agree, IMO we have the big target man in Parkin. We need a little nippy player, Like Leon Knight. Ive got to say i was VERY dissapointed when Royle missed out on him. But for me it just prooves my theory about Royle being inept in the transfer market in general
Wrong - He's not a target man. He may be tall but he's clearly not a target man. Even by his own admission he prefers it to his feet. Would appear even Joe Royle thinks like you Luke.

the-mole
Posts: 2053
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:01 am
Location: The Dunny
Contact:

Post by the-mole » Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:14 pm

I guess with our finances being as tight as they are it is simple!!

If he is a success then he would be a bargain - however we cannot afford to throw £5 at a failure - lets hope JR's judgement is good in Alan's case!!

hallamblue
Posts: 33336
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
Location: Ipswich Town F.C.

Post by hallamblue » Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:20 pm

Aluren wrote:Agreed, if people get behind him and the team plays like we did on Saturday, he'll be banging them in. Parkin is a good player, don't knock him, he's still our top scorer.

exactly !...and how long has he been out of action ..and STILL no one else can match his current goals scored !

hallamblue
Posts: 33336
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
Location: Ipswich Town F.C.

Post by hallamblue » Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:10 pm

guess we have got ourselves a bargin - WELL DONE JOE ROYLE !!

Ashton????? - who are ya ?..or should that be "where are you"

Ojc
Posts: 2547
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:49 pm
Location: Reading, Berkshire

Post by Ojc » Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:52 pm

I think he answered the question today.

User avatar
Riviera
Posts: 22224
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 10:07 am
Location: Chudleigh Knighton - On the edge of Dartmoor

Post by Riviera » Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:24 pm

Ojc wrote:I think he answered the question today.
told ya not to judge him on his 1st couple of performances, i take all that back, the guy was great today, even when completely knackered in the 2nd half he ran his fooking socks off and caused soton problems all afternoon

User avatar
vaalae
Posts: 5818
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 5:29 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: £100k too much for Alan Lee ?

Post by vaalae » Sun Jan 22, 2006 10:10 pm

[quote="hallamblue"]..here we go again ...seems like some fans (primarily on TWTD I hasten to add) are feeling that we cant have a good player cos he's only cost £100k.

David Nugent cost Preston 100k.....wouldnt mind him playing for us! Hopefully he's convinced a few doubters...could be a flash in the pan, but at least he'll get a fair crack from the majority of fans after two good performances...physical..works hard...scores goals..HA Theo who!!! 8)

User avatar
Adi
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:11 am
Location: Idaho

Re: £100k too much for Alan Lee ?

Post by Adi » Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:58 am

hallamblue wrote:..here we go again ...seems like some fans (primarily on TWTD I hasten to add) are feeling that we cant have a good player cos he's only cost £100k.

Well all I can say is

...how much did we pay for Kuqi ?? - and look how he finished up playing for us !

....£3+ million dosent "guarantee goals " - ref Mr Ashton - who, IMHO has been "ordinary" at best , since he joined that bunch of misfits north of the boarder..and he hasnt exactly "progressed his career" with a £3m + transfer fee has he !

so donmt judge a book by it's cover as they dsay...lets wait anfd see what Lee can do - and dont expect it to "happen" over a couple of game seither - well I not anyway !
looking at the two goals he got on Saturday,IMO he is well worth the money :lol:

Anglo-Saxon
Posts: 4054
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am

Post by Anglo-Saxon » Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:54 am

Just seen the goals on Ipswich World, seems like a good, honest and solid striker to me.

Post Reply