£100k too much for Alan Lee ?
Moderators: Charnwood, Bluemike
-
- Posts: 33336
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
£100k too much for Alan Lee ?
..here we go again ...seems like some fans (primarily on TWTD I hasten to add) are feeling that we cant have a good player cos he's only cost £100k.
Well all I can say is
...how much did we pay for Kuqi ?? - and look how he finished up playing for us !
....£3+ million dosent "guarantee goals " - ref Mr Ashton - who, IMHO has been "ordinary" at best , since he joined that bunch of misfits north of the boarder..and he hasnt exactly "progressed his career" with a £3m + transfer fee has he !
so donmt judge a book by it's cover as they dsay...lets wait anfd see what Lee can do - and dont expect it to "happen" over a couple of game seither - well I not anyway !
Well all I can say is
...how much did we pay for Kuqi ?? - and look how he finished up playing for us !
....£3+ million dosent "guarantee goals " - ref Mr Ashton - who, IMHO has been "ordinary" at best , since he joined that bunch of misfits north of the boarder..and he hasnt exactly "progressed his career" with a £3m + transfer fee has he !
so donmt judge a book by it's cover as they dsay...lets wait anfd see what Lee can do - and dont expect it to "happen" over a couple of game seither - well I not anyway !
-
- Posts: 1327
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:06 pm
- Location: Clacton-on-sea
- Contact:
Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
-
- Posts: 33336
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !ippers wrote:Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.hallamblue wrote:agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !ippers wrote:Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
- Dazza
- Posts: 12611
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:48 am
- Location: London
Its hard to know if we're getting value for money, not sure how people can just assume...
If he scored 10 goals this season it'll be buy of the century, if he scores none it'll be 100K wasted, we'll have to wait and see.
TWTD posters are truely idiots. I go there sometimes just to lurk for a laugh, if I wanna talk about football I'll come here!
If he scored 10 goals this season it'll be buy of the century, if he scores none it'll be 100K wasted, we'll have to wait and see.
TWTD posters are truely idiots. I go there sometimes just to lurk for a laugh, if I wanna talk about football I'll come here!
-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.Mork wrote:He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.hallamblue wrote:agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !ippers wrote:Def not, its impossible to get a striker who is banging the goals in at a decent level on the cheap, because obviously clubs dont give those sorta player away. But if we managed to say get Fuller on loan aswell thst 2 strikers that 2 or 3 years ago were banging in 20 goals a season at this level, so if you get the best outta Lee then 100k will seem like a bargain, 100k isn't a huge amount of money so it is a good buy IMO
If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands

-
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am
He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th gameLewis wrote:You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.Mork wrote:He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.hallamblue wrote: agreed !...£100k is not even peanuts in todays game ...but then again you dont aleways get the end product if you pay mega bucks either !
If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands



OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!Anglo-Saxon wrote:He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th gameLewis wrote:You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.Mork wrote: He's got have a value, he's a bloody international. I'm hoping he's hungry, and finally we see Joe making a signing up front that really delivers something in the way of goals. I don't expect him to bang in 3 a match, but Parkin and Forster have just been a waste of our time and money; a goal every couple of matches would be a nice start.
If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands![]()
![]()
![]()
OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am
Lewis wrote:There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!Anglo-Saxon wrote:He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th gameLewis wrote: You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.
If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands![]()
![]()
![]()
OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
I did say "OK apart from when he was injured"

-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
So how can you say he's scored in 4 games out of 28 thenAnglo-Saxon wrote:Lewis wrote:There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!Anglo-Saxon wrote: He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th game![]()
![]()
![]()
OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!
I did say "OK apart from when he was injured"

More negative spin to make it look like he's been an awful signing?!
-
- Posts: 15861
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:50 pm
- Location: Huddersfield
He's played 17 with 2 sub appearences scoring 5 goals with 3 yellow cardsLewis wrote:There's noway Parkin has played 28 games for this football club!!!!Anglo-Saxon wrote:He's scored in four games out of 28, that's every 7th gameLewis wrote: You say a goal every couple of matches. Isn't Parkin's record something similar? He's STILL our top goalscorer and will benefit from playing in a muchly improved, mobile midfield.
If fans of clubs got on the backs of players of their respective teams because they don't score every game we'd have a striker mutiny on our hands![]()
![]()
![]()
OK apart from when he was injured!!!!!!!!!!!!


-
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am
-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am
2 goals were in one game FFS'sLewis wrote:Every 4 games mate... he's scored 5 goals....Anglo-Saxon wrote:Just looked it up, he has played 17 plus he came on twice as a sub, thats about 19 games, so he scores every 5th game then LOL
OK I'll put it another way:
Sam has scored in four of the games he has played in



-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
Lets just remember it isn't all about goals. The fans at Portman Road got on Parkins back quickly, not because they're idiots, because Parking has not looked like he is that good - poor first touch, head makes contact with ball only 1 in 30 attempts, and his flick ons and possession play look very very poor compared to our other players.
I'm still hoping he turns out good, but lets not try to paint a picture where people have decided not to back him for no reason.
I'm still hoping he turns out good, but lets not try to paint a picture where people have decided not to back him for no reason.
-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
I'm sorry but how could he have looked good in the side we played at the start of the season? Forster constantly played 40 yards away from him so any flick ons or lay offs he did make were useless cos Forster was so far apart - not Parkin's fault.Mork wrote:Lets just remember it isn't all about goals. The fans at Portman Road got on Parkins back quickly, not because they're idiots, because Parking has not looked like he is that good - poor first touch, head makes contact with ball only 1 in 30 attempts, and his flick ons and possession play look very very poor compared to our other players.
I'm still hoping he turns out good, but lets not try to paint a picture where people have decided not to back him for no reason.
He's said himself he's not a target man, Horlock, Magilton and the like all aimed for Parkin's head - again, not his fault.
And would you not get tense and nervous when in possession when you have 24,500 of your own fans getting on your back for doing nothing wrong?
- Aluren
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:44 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Completly agree, IMO we have the big target man in Parkin. We need a little nippy player, Like Leon Knight. Ive got to say i was VERY dissapointed when Royle missed out on him. But for me it just prooves my theory about Royle being inept in the transfer market in generaledo_blue wrote:£100,000 is a waste of money for a Rotherham reject, which is what he is. Hope he proves me wrong, but I very much doubt it
-
- Posts: 4603
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2003 9:41 pm
- Location: Stowmarket
- Contact:
Wrong - He's not a target man. He may be tall but he's clearly not a target man. Even by his own admission he prefers it to his feet. Would appear even Joe Royle thinks like you Luke.Luke wrote:Completly agree, IMO we have the big target man in Parkin. We need a little nippy player, Like Leon Knight. Ive got to say i was VERY dissapointed when Royle missed out on him. But for me it just prooves my theory about Royle being inept in the transfer market in generaledo_blue wrote:£100,000 is a waste of money for a Rotherham reject, which is what he is. Hope he proves me wrong, but I very much doubt it
-
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:01 am
- Location: The Dunny
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 33336
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
-
- Posts: 33336
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
- Riviera
- Posts: 22224
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 10:07 am
- Location: Chudleigh Knighton - On the edge of Dartmoor
- vaalae
- Posts: 5818
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 5:29 am
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: £100k too much for Alan Lee ?
[quote="hallamblue"]..here we go again ...seems like some fans (primarily on TWTD I hasten to add) are feeling that we cant have a good player cos he's only cost £100k.
David Nugent cost Preston 100k.....wouldnt mind him playing for us! Hopefully he's convinced a few doubters...could be a flash in the pan, but at least he'll get a fair crack from the majority of fans after two good performances...physical..works hard...scores goals..HA Theo who!!!
David Nugent cost Preston 100k.....wouldnt mind him playing for us! Hopefully he's convinced a few doubters...could be a flash in the pan, but at least he'll get a fair crack from the majority of fans after two good performances...physical..works hard...scores goals..HA Theo who!!!

- Adi
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 1:11 am
- Location: Idaho
Re: £100k too much for Alan Lee ?
looking at the two goals he got on Saturday,IMO he is well worth the moneyhallamblue wrote:..here we go again ...seems like some fans (primarily on TWTD I hasten to add) are feeling that we cant have a good player cos he's only cost £100k.
Well all I can say is
...how much did we pay for Kuqi ?? - and look how he finished up playing for us !
....£3+ million dosent "guarantee goals " - ref Mr Ashton - who, IMHO has been "ordinary" at best , since he joined that bunch of misfits north of the boarder..and he hasnt exactly "progressed his career" with a £3m + transfer fee has he !
so donmt judge a book by it's cover as they dsay...lets wait anfd see what Lee can do - and dont expect it to "happen" over a couple of game seither - well I not anyway !

-
- Posts: 4054
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:21 am