Page 1 of 1

Will BFJ come to his senses???

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:33 pm
by missfreeblue
Will Joe Royle start with REUSER?
We now have a very long injury list...very long will he have any sense and start him! I know several of you will dissagree but i think REUSER has got potential. He came on and scored our only goal last saturday but Royle never gave him enough time to try and show us what he is worth!!!
:D :D :D :D :wink: :wink: :wink: 8) 8) 8) 8)

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:34 pm
by budgiebasher
would love to see reuser play but joe would probably rather throw in an unknown youngster than reuser :roll: :roll:

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:37 pm
by Paul B
He should start with Reuser, but he won't. :(

He has made it clear that he only sees Reuser as a supersub.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:43 pm
by blue boy
i think he may with the injury probs he has but who knows
i would like to see it :)

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:51 pm
by missfreeblue
I dont think he will start him but if he would just start him we could get a few goals and then when he gets tired or cant play any more sub him! Royle reckons he wont start Reuser because he is not match fit but he is not going to get match fit by sitting on a bench is he?
:!: :!: :!:

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:35 am
by chris
missfreeblue wrote:I dont think he will start him but if he would just start him we could get a few goals and then when he gets tired or cant play any more sub him! Royle reckons he wont start Reuser because he is not match fit but he is not going to get match fit by sitting on a bench is he?
:!: :!: :!:
I don't think we'll him start, and I don't know that he should.

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 1:44 pm
by dukey33
From the way that Reuser plays i for one dont think he can play a full 90 mins and be in the game as he does seem to lose interest from now and again.
There again i dont think Jamma is a 90 min player at the mo.
From the way Jamma played last sat i forgot he was on the pitch!
Reuser is a great player from the bench and thats the way Joe is playing him.

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:54 pm
by rossi
I doubt it very much.

By playing Rueser from the start, Joe will be more or less admitting that he was wrong. When has he ever done that in his managerial career??

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:17 pm
by Foxy Lady
Joe needs to start Reuser.....we need a player that can go forward rather than sit back.
Reuser has proved himself that he is worthy for a deserved start...

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:31 pm
by dukey33
He cant play a full 90 mins of football and ok like you say he goes forward but over 90mins he gets bored and doesnt stay in the game enough.Sorry but hes not a 90 min player.Strange to say that but i really cant remember the last time he had a good 90 mins?

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:38 pm
by chris
dukey33 wrote:He cant play a full 90 mins of football and ok like you say he goes forward but over 90mins he gets bored and doesnt stay in the game enough.Sorry but hes not a 90 min player.Strange to say that but i really cant remember the last time he had a good 90 mins?
Maybe the poll should have been do you think Reuser should start?

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:45 pm
by dukey33
My reply too that would be no.He takes a great free kick but im afraid hes had his time with us and nows his time to move on.That wont go down to well with a few people.Has any club come in for him as hes still on a free?

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:48 pm
by chris
dukey33 wrote:My reply too that would be no.He takes a great free kick but im afraid hes had his time with us and nows his time to move on.That wont go down to well with a few people.Has any club come in for him as hes still on a free?
Exactly, if he is that good, why has nobody made a move to sign him. He has been on a free for almost a year now.........

Having said that I would like to keep him as a sub, but on less money of course.

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:25 pm
by missfreeblue
dukey33 wrote:He cant play a full 90 mins of football and ok like you say he goes forward but over 90mins he gets bored and doesnt stay in the game enough.Sorry but hes not a 90 min player.Strange to say that but i really cant remember the last time he had a good 90 mins?
How can you say he gets bored when playing a who 90 minute game? He has not even had much of a chance to play a whole 90 has he? (as Royle thinks he is not fully fit). He has scored two goals in the last two matches and i think that is good! He has only been given the chance recently to pop a goal in at the end of a match, if he is given enough time maybe he could grab us another 3 points :!:

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:03 pm
by budgiebasher
very true! i dont think he has played a whole 90mins this season, so maybe give him a try and lets see what he can do for us

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 3:22 pm
by chris
budgiebasher wrote:very true! i dont think he has played a whole 90mins this season, so maybe give him a try and lets see what he can do for us
He started against Derby in what I believe was the FA Cup tie.

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 3:25 pm
by rossi
chrisavo wrote:
budgiebasher wrote:very true! i dont think he has played a whole 90mins this season, so maybe give him a try and lets see what he can do for us
He started against Derby in what I believe was the FA Cup tie.
He did - and I don't think he did anything at all to warrant being excluded from the starting line-up of the following game.

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 3:25 pm
by budgiebasher
ooops :oops:

didnt go to that game so i forgot about that

but even still he set up the 3rd goal(should be his goal anyway)

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 5:42 pm
by Miller-8
Personally since injuries are increasing, Royle has GOT TO start him. That way, we can see if he can last 90 mins, which if he can, GREAT :D , and if he can't, sub him and continue to use him as SUPER SUB 8) !

Surely this weekend is Rueser's opportunity to prove himself.

Go Rueser! :D :D

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2004 6:27 pm
by London ITFC Fan
alternatively he could play starting at half time.