Godfrey
Moderators: Charnwood, Bluemike
-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Godfrey
Just seen such couple of posts on twtd saying they'd heard his loan deal had been cancelled. Anyone else heard anything? I don't think he's injured, but O'Shea went to RB sat didn't he...
Tbh Godfrey has been a bit of a disappointment. I thought we'd found a good player ( which he used to be when at scum and then Everton) .....
Tbh Godfrey has been a bit of a disappointment. I thought we'd found a good player ( which he used to be when at scum and then Everton) .....
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 32123
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Godfrey
Typical Scummer, never did sit well with me LOL.
- Charnwood
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 20727
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:25 pm
- Location: Moraira, Spain.
Re: Godfrey
I can’t say I’m bothered as to be honest I don’t think he’s good enough for a place in our team.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2025 5:26 pm
Re: Godfrey
He is crap and slow. Him vs Son in the Tottenham game was the biggest mismatch of the season.
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 32123
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Godfrey
Yep, was embarrassing
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 32123
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Godfrey
Has to go down as bad recruitment though.
-
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2021 8:48 pm
Re: Godfrey
It's more likely to be utter bollox from that crap sites forum
🫣






-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 32123
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Godfrey
No we haven't although for me Godfrey and Muric are disasters.
Clarke and Philogene so far pretty disappointing
Szmodics used really poorly
Phillips no way worth the wages, been very inconsistent
That's probably half the signings that could be questioned in one way or another.
Clarke and Philogene so far pretty disappointing
Szmodics used really poorly
Phillips no way worth the wages, been very inconsistent
That's probably half the signings that could be questioned in one way or another.
-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Re: Godfrey
Yes, very true. I think Mick Mills alluded to the fact that even of Phillips put in good performance for the redt of the season, it's been a costly loan signing. But there was no way if expecting a very good player not to come good again. Muric was never our intended GK. Fir life of me I don't know why we signed him given the obvious poor reports about him. I guess McKenna thought they could change him ( and Phillips?)
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 32123
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Godfrey
I must admit I always felt the cost of Phillips was extortionate but I did feel he would grasp the chance and relight his career, he hasn't.
As for Muric, I won't say to anyone " I told you so" But......
As for Muric, I won't say to anyone " I told you so" But......
-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
- marko69
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 25725
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:16 am
- Location: Somewhere between here and there.
Re: Godfrey
Quote from that ^^^^^^^^
"Have heard rumblings that an internal decision was made for him not to even bother training/being here with us, just wasn't up to anywhere near the sort of standard we needed."
End quote.
--------------------------------------
That alone is why you really should stay away from that forum, Hallam. Utter wind and unbelievable pish.
The "rumblings" is the persons belly after opening his / her/ he/ she/ they/ them mouth!
- Charnwood
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 20727
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:25 pm
- Location: Moraira, Spain.
Re: Godfrey
I’m not sure McKenna had a lot of input into identifying Muric as a potential signing. I’m sure I read somewhere that Muric was a technology /data system generated signing.hallamblue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 3:44 pmYes, very true. I think Mick Mills alluded to the fact that even of Phillips put in good performance for the redt of the season, it's been a costly loan signing. But there was no way if expecting a very good player not to come good again. Muric was never our intended GK. Fir life of me I don't know why we signed him given the obvious poor reports about him. I guess McKenna thought they could change him ( and Phillips?)
-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Re: Godfrey
If that is the case, where IS he? Godfrey seems to have fallen off the face of the earth. Never mentioned. No sign of him in the IG training videos Town post. Nowhere to be seen on the hallowed bench. Never mentioned, strangely, in McKenna's round up interviews. All a bit odd.marko69 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 16, 2025 6:38 pmQuote from that ^^^^^^^^
"Have heard rumblings that an internal decision was made for him not to even bother training/being here with us, just wasn't up to anywhere near the sort of standard we needed."
End quote.
--------------------------------------
That alone is why you really should stay away from that forum, Hallam. Utter wind and unbelievable pish.
The "rumblings" is the persons belly after opening his / her/ he/ she/ they/ them mouth!
I know twtd has its hard core knows but thete are one or two on there that do speak common sense and there are two, I believe, that have some connection with the club on the inside....and their posts about various things are invariably true ( it will later transpire)
-
- Posts: 33096
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Re: Godfrey
Well if that is the case they can stuff data identification then can't they.Charnwood wrote: ↑Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:41 pmI’m not sure McKenna had a lot of input into identifying Muric as a potential signing. I’m sure I read somewhere that Muric was a technology /data system generated signing.hallamblue wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 3:44 pmYes, very true. I think Mick Mills alluded to the fact that even of Phillips put in good performance for the redt of the season, it's been a costly loan signing. But there was no way if expecting a very good player not to come good again. Muric was never our intended GK. Fir life of me I don't know why we signed him given the obvious poor reports about him. I guess McKenna thought they could change him ( and Phillips?)

IF it's down to an "Ashton signing", without McKenna's input, then I'm concerned.