Woolfy
Moderators: marko69, Bluemike, Charnwood
-
- Posts: 2250
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:07 pm
Re: Woolfy
No it’s because he is a class defender, he gets some flack as his playing style is laid back but look at the way he reads the game, makes good interceptions, had a turn of pace, and crucially got KM and alot of managers - he is comfortable on the ball.
Let’s be honest KM knows 1000x what we do about football and if he rates him then I won’t question it.
In my view it had zero to do with home grown, otherwise Clarke wouldn’t haven been replaced by a loan player, HUMPHREYS has been at the club way longer than Baggot and doesn’t get game time etc.
Non starter of a conversation for me sorry
Let’s be honest KM knows 1000x what we do about football and if he rates him then I won’t question it.
In my view it had zero to do with home grown, otherwise Clarke wouldn’t haven been replaced by a loan player, HUMPHREYS has been at the club way longer than Baggot and doesn’t get game time etc.
Non starter of a conversation for me sorry
- Mauswara
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:15 am
Re: Woolfy
To think Cook left him in the reserves. Reckon he's still young enough to improve. We have the right coaching.shabba wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 8:36 amNo it’s because he is a class defender, he gets some flack as his playing style is laid back but look at the way he reads the game, makes good interceptions, had a turn of pace, and crucially got KM and alot of managers - he is comfortable on the ball.
Let’s be honest KM knows 1000x what we do about football and if he rates him then I won’t question it.
In my view it had zero to do with home grown, otherwise Clarke wouldn’t haven been replaced by a loan player, HUMPHREYS has been at the club way longer than Baggot and doesn’t get game time etc.
Non starter of a conversation for me sorry
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 30065
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Woolfy
I have taken to looking at rival teams forums just before and after we play them to get their fans views on us, it is fair to say lots of opposition fans see Woolfy as a decent player.
Quite a compliment on the Sunderland forum where they have a whole thread entitled Ipswich, most of them feel we are the real deal.
Quite a compliment on the Sunderland forum where they have a whole thread entitled Ipswich, most of them feel we are the real deal.
- Mauswara
- Posts: 602
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:15 am
Re: Woolfy
I'm getting perilously close to believing that.Bluemike wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 10:25 amI have taken to looking at rival teams forums just before and after we play them to get their fans views on us, it is fair to say lots of opposition fans see Woolfy as a decent player.
Quite a compliment on the Sunderland forum where they have a whole thread entitled Ipswich, most of them feel we are the real deal.
- number 9
- Posts: 6749
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:35 pm
Re: Woolfy
I am not saying Woolfy doesn't deserve to start. KM knows exactly what he's doing, but I'd still like to see Baggott as part of the rotation of our defenders. He's proven he's good enough to start. Good point about Humphreys...he's kind of disappeared of late. I don't really consider Clarke a homegrown talent. Sure he spent some time here in the youth set up, but he's been molded into the player he is at Arsenal.shabba wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2023 8:36 amNo it’s because he is a class defender, he gets some flack as his playing style is laid back but look at the way he reads the game, makes good interceptions, had a turn of pace, and crucially got KM and alot of managers - he is comfortable on the ball.
Let’s be honest KM knows 1000x what we do about football and if he rates him then I won’t question it.
In my view it had zero to do with home grown, otherwise Clarke wouldn’t haven been replaced by a loan player, HUMPHREYS has been at the club way longer than Baggot and doesn’t get game time etc.
Non starter of a conversation for me sorry
Woofy has done very well. In fact, I have defended him when others criticized. It would'nt hurt to give him rest from time to time. I suppose at the moment Tuanzebe is that relief, but if a defender goes down I hope Baggott will be available.
- Bluemike
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 30065
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Ipswich
Re: Woolfy
Baggott is definitely good enough and ready in my opinion, has been for some time.
- Ricco
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:05 pm
Re: Woolfy
Wolfenden 25yo and 230 professional appearances, Baggott 21yo and 40 professional appearances... I think that's pretty much it. To rely on a inexperienced 21 year old at this level is quite a big thing.
I'm not saying Baggott's not good enough, but he'd have to be exceptional to trump the other experienced and proven pros above him. If it were me, I'd have had him loaned to play in league 1 this season with the option to recall him. He's obviously held in high regard and must be happy with the plan, which I imagine is 'you can play in the cup games and you may get an opportunity to fight your way in to the first team'.
I'm not saying Baggott's not good enough, but he'd have to be exceptional to trump the other experienced and proven pros above him. If it were me, I'd have had him loaned to play in league 1 this season with the option to recall him. He's obviously held in high regard and must be happy with the plan, which I imagine is 'you can play in the cup games and you may get an opportunity to fight your way in to the first team'.
- ashfordblue
- Posts: 3003
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:52 pm
- Location: Ashford Kent / was Felixstowe
Re: Woolfy
Well, Burgess will be on International duty for Australia come Jan and Luongo as well, so there will be a gap for Axel in defence, as for the midfield it is more or less take your pick from the bunch we have but Humphries could get a chance.
- Charnwood
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 19417
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:25 pm
- Location: Moraira, Spain.
Re: Woolfy
I like Woolfie and think he’s still in development and will continue to improve. My biggest concern is the number of times he gives possession away unnecessarily and I’m not sure if it’s his too casual style or lack of concentration. Whatever it is hopefully McKenna will be able to coach it out of him.
-
- Posts: 31276
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Re: Woolfy
That’s the flaw in his play ( amongst other which me n Mike were chatting about today at the game. He had improved a lot. But there’s always a mistake in his game that costs us at some point.
It’s less frequent but it’s still there, and at 25yrs he’s not a youngster now and with those number of appearances, neither is he inexperienced. We do need better I’m afraid but he’s a decent back and I think that’s what he’ll end up being.
It’s less frequent but it’s still there, and at 25yrs he’s not a youngster now and with those number of appearances, neither is he inexperienced. We do need better I’m afraid but he’s a decent back and I think that’s what he’ll end up being.