Royle Out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Moderators: Charnwood, Bluemike
- The Odious Mr Rossi
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 3:18 pm
- Location: Broomfield
Royle Out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's what I've always said - first of all I was very much in the minority but it's interesting that in the last few weeks a lot more people are questioning his managership.
Enough has already been written about last night - I'll just add that you could almost smell the fear of our players when they walked onto the pitch last night, and it showed........time and time again they just let Reading run and run with the ball, nobody wanted to take any responsibility. But can you blame them when the manager's idea of motivation for a home game is to field the most negative formation he could..........what sort of message does that give to the players?? No, they're not the most gifted set of players in the division, but they're capable of a hell of a lot better than last night, they just need the right motivation and tactics.
I saw a post by the-mole which suggested that we get Bobby Robson in as a short term measure - not a bad idea but one which needs modifying slightly. What we really need is a young manager who will give chances to and get the best out of the young talent we have. We all know Magilton wants to go into coaching..........it's been said that he wants to return to the midlands but I bet he'd jump at the chance to have a go here.
So get Royle out, tell Jim his playing days are over and give him the manager's job, and get Bobby Robson in for 18 months to mentor him.
Enough has already been written about last night - I'll just add that you could almost smell the fear of our players when they walked onto the pitch last night, and it showed........time and time again they just let Reading run and run with the ball, nobody wanted to take any responsibility. But can you blame them when the manager's idea of motivation for a home game is to field the most negative formation he could..........what sort of message does that give to the players?? No, they're not the most gifted set of players in the division, but they're capable of a hell of a lot better than last night, they just need the right motivation and tactics.
I saw a post by the-mole which suggested that we get Bobby Robson in as a short term measure - not a bad idea but one which needs modifying slightly. What we really need is a young manager who will give chances to and get the best out of the young talent we have. We all know Magilton wants to go into coaching..........it's been said that he wants to return to the midlands but I bet he'd jump at the chance to have a go here.
So get Royle out, tell Jim his playing days are over and give him the manager's job, and get Bobby Robson in for 18 months to mentor him.
- Earl Blue
- Posts: 27506
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Blighty
- Contact:
- Dazza
- Posts: 12611
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:48 am
- Location: London
Firstly I agree with Rossi, I dont think Royle is crap, I just think its time to start planning for the next 5 years and Royle wont be around for that long.Ojc wrote:Is that a band wagon? I'll jump on it, we have the team, now they need the motivation and Royle is lacking in it.
But the main point I wanna say is the the comment above "we have the team". Which I disagree with. If these young players could do the job JR would be playing them, but we DONT have the team because the players cant do the job.
- Earl Blue
- Posts: 27506
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Blighty
- Contact:
I find it hard to actual believe we DONT have the team, purely because WHAT CHANCE have we actually given them..Dazza wrote:Firstly I agree with Rossi, I dont think Royle is crap, I just think its time to start planning for the next 5 years and Royle wont be around for that long.Ojc wrote:Is that a band wagon? I'll jump on it, we have the team, now they need the motivation and Royle is lacking in it.
But the main point I wanna say is the the comment above "we have the team". Which I disagree with. If these young players could do the job JR would be playing them, but we DONT have the team because the players cant do the job.
- Kheffan
- Posts: 2575
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 9:58 pm
Re: Royle Out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In theory a good idea, in practical terms ,never gonna happen.rossi wrote:That's what I've always said - first of all I was very much in the minority but it's interesting that in the last few weeks a lot more people are questioning his managership.
Enough has already been written about last night - I'll just add that you could almost smell the fear of our players when they walked onto the pitch last night, and it showed........time and time again they just let Reading run and run with the ball, nobody wanted to take any responsibility. But can you blame them when the manager's idea of motivation for a home game is to field the most negative formation he could..........what sort of message does that give to the players?? No, they're not the most gifted set of players in the division, but they're capable of a hell of a lot better than last night, they just need the right motivation and tactics.
I saw a post by the-mole which suggested that we get Bobby Robson in as a short term measure - not a bad idea but one which needs modifying slightly. What we really need is a young manager who will give chances to and get the best out of the young talent we have. We all know Magilton wants to go into coaching..........it's been said that he wants to return to the midlands but I bet he'd jump at the chance to have a go here.
So get Royle out, tell Jim his playing days are over and give him the manager's job, and get Bobby Robson in for 18 months to mentor him.
-
- Posts: 10333
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:07 am
- Location: Herts
Nail hit firmly on head, Earl.Earl Blue wrote:I find it hard to actual believe we DONT have the team, purely because WHAT CHANCE have we actually given them..Dazza wrote:Firstly I agree with Rossi, I dont think Royle is crap, I just think its time to start planning for the next 5 years and Royle wont be around for that long.Ojc wrote:Is that a band wagon? I'll jump on it, we have the team, now they need the motivation and Royle is lacking in it.
But the main point I wanna say is the the comment above "we have the team". Which I disagree with. If these young players could do the job JR would be playing them, but we DONT have the team because the players cant do the job.
What is the purpose to this season? What is the plan? Where are the long term benefits? Do we really believe that DeVos, Horlock, Magilton, Currie, Wilnis are the future!
IMHO we need to write off this season, but blood as many youngsters as we can, we a view of being a force in the future! Most supporters would be more patient with home grown youngsters as opposed to journey man pros at the end of their careers who clearly don't give a sh*t!
- Dazza
- Posts: 12611
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 12:48 am
- Location: London
Peters and MacDonald started out well but their form dipped, the only youngster to come in and do well is Garvan, and he gets a starting place.Earl Blue wrote:I find it hard to actual believe we DONT have the team, purely because WHAT CHANCE have we actually given them..
If they're good enough they do get the chance.... but there not!
- Earl Blue
- Posts: 27506
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Blighty
- Contact:
Ok Dazza, if taking that into consideration, Do you think theyDazza wrote:Peters and MacDonald started out well but their form dipped, the only youngster to come in and do well is Garvan, and he gets a starting place.Earl Blue wrote:I find it hard to actual believe we DONT have the team, purely because WHAT CHANCE have we actually given them..
If they're good enough they do get the chance.... but there not!
could do any worse??
-
- Posts: 10333
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:07 am
- Location: Herts
Sorry boss man, the air must be a bit thin up there today, because that is rubbish!Dazza wrote:Peters and MacDonald started out well but their form dipped, the only youngster to come in and do well is Garvan, and he gets a starting place.Earl Blue wrote:I find it hard to actual believe we DONT have the team, purely because WHAT CHANCE have we actually given them..
If they're good enough they do get the chance.... but there not!

Joe has played these lads as one offs in a struggling team, and even if they have a good game, Garven aside their reward is often not even a place on the bench next match.
Example, McDonald brilliant against Sheff Wed & Derby, didn't even make the 16 for the following games!
Richards looks good on the left, so Royle either drops him, or moves him to the middle to make him look sh*t again! Young Haynes looked promising at Leeds, can't have that drop him and pick horlock.
Joe selections and sustitutions this term, have sometimes defied belief
- uefacup81
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 11:32 am
- Location: Norwich, Norfolk
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 11:01 am
- Location: The Dunny
- Contact:
Dazza - royle has never been a fan of youth and would much rather stick out a bunch of older guys than rely on younger talent!!
Yes some of the youngsters haven't always been on top form - but that goes for the whole bloody team!!! Yet the old boys are still playing. McDonald has impressed me when he has been involved - yet they are talking about shipping him out!
Royle has constantly picked defensively minded sides this season, these teams have been poor, lacking in discipline and seem to have no clue what so ever. Now our youth side looks like a team who know each others games well and who can play a bit. Which is more than can be said of the first team - so why not give the youngsters a go - all of them!! Can they do any worse probably not!!
Yes some of the youngsters haven't always been on top form - but that goes for the whole bloody team!!! Yet the old boys are still playing. McDonald has impressed me when he has been involved - yet they are talking about shipping him out!
Royle has constantly picked defensively minded sides this season, these teams have been poor, lacking in discipline and seem to have no clue what so ever. Now our youth side looks like a team who know each others games well and who can play a bit. Which is more than can be said of the first team - so why not give the youngsters a go - all of them!! Can they do any worse probably not!!
-
- Posts: 33285
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Re: Royle Out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
...and where do you propose this flat broke Club of ours gets the money to pay off JR and get Robson in ?rossi wrote:That's what I've always said - first of all I was very much in the minority but it's interesting that in the last few weeks a lot more people are questioning his managership.
Enough has already been written about last night - I'll just add that you could almost smell the fear of our players when they walked onto the pitch last night, and it showed........time and time again they just let Reading run and run with the ball, nobody wanted to take any responsibility. But can you blame them when the manager's idea of motivation for a home game is to field the most negative formation he could..........what sort of message does that give to the players?? No, they're not the most gifted set of players in the division, but they're capable of a hell of a lot better than last night, they just need the right motivation and tactics.
I saw a post by the-mole which suggested that we get Bobby Robson in as a short term measure - not a bad idea but one which needs modifying slightly. What we really need is a young manager who will give chances to and get the best out of the young talent we have. We all know Magilton wants to go into coaching..........it's been said that he wants to return to the midlands but I bet he'd jump at the chance to have a go here.
So get Royle out, tell Jim his playing days are over and give him the manager's job, and get Bobby Robson in for 18 months to mentor him.
-
- Posts: 33285
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
-
- Posts: 10333
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:07 am
- Location: Herts
Come on Dazza, we played well against Sheffield and won, and played better against Derby and only failed to win, because we can't defend! McDonald's pace and movement made a significant contribution to those good performances.Dazza wrote:As in the striker who hasnt scored for us?bluebird wrote:Example, McDonald brilliant against Sheff Wed & Derby, didn't even make the 16 for the following games!
We have a scoring problem...
Dont care how he plays!
IMHO if Parkin, had played half as well this season as McDonald did in those two games, he wouldn't be called a donkey!
-
- Posts: 33285
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Ipswich Town F.C.
Eeeaw, eeeaw eealways says that !bluebird wrote:Come on Dazza, we played well against Sheffield and won, and played better against Derby and only failed to win, because we can't defend! McDonald's pace and movement made a significant contribution to those good performances.Dazza wrote:As in the striker who hasnt scored for us?bluebird wrote:Example, McDonald brilliant against Sheff Wed & Derby, didn't even make the 16 for the following games!
We have a scoring problem...
Dont care how he plays!
IMHO if Parkin, had played half as well this season as McDonald did in those two games, he wouldn't be called a donkey!

-
- Posts: 3084
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 9:55 pm
- Location: Swavesey, Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1890
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:44 pm
- The Odious Mr Rossi
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 3:18 pm
- Location: Broomfield
Let's get this straight...............I admit I've got a few bob, but even if I could raise £6-8 million to take control of the club it would be a pretty stupid thing for me to do given the fact that I'd effectively be buying £30 million worth of debt. But I couldn't raise that much anyway, and I've never said I could.hallamblue wrote:Gaz wrote:Rossi has got enough money to buy potato heads contract out![]()
![]()
dare I say ..."put yer money where yer mouth is Rossi !"
Come on guys it wouldnt be Ipswich Town - if we didnt have all this heartache now would it !
My whole point is that it's the job of the directors to fund the long term interests of the club. I don't know how much Royle is on, but I'm sure as hell that it would be cheaper in the long run to pay Royle off now and get a new management team in, rather than possibly suffer a much reduced income from attendances in the next few seasons. The directors of the club are directors by choice, and they should realise that directorship isn't all about dining extravagently before matches and the like but that sometimes it is their responsibility as directors to put their hands in their pockets.
- Dubai Blue
- Posts: 5078
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 2:18 pm
- Location: Dubai, UAE
I'm not sure if it would be that stupid Rossi. Don't forget that the huge majority of that debt is supposed to be financed by increased attendances. Another couple of million available for new players (& of course settling JRs contract) could be just what is needed to keep up those attendances and improve our chances of promotion. Then a 5 year view might see a significant income on that investment
Of course at the end of the day it would be just a gamble
Personally I'm surprised that there are not more new investors in football since there are very many people out there rich enough to have 10 million in their back pockets as small change.
I guess multi-millionaires are generally not football fans.
Do we have any cases of big lottery winners taking control of football clubs ?

Of course at the end of the day it would be just a gamble

Personally I'm surprised that there are not more new investors in football since there are very many people out there rich enough to have 10 million in their back pockets as small change.
I guess multi-millionaires are generally not football fans.
Do we have any cases of big lottery winners taking control of football clubs ?
-
- Posts: 10333
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 10:07 am
- Location: Herts
Spot on Rossi, and we will continue to struggle for as long as the current board are unable, or unwilling to provide the working capital that the business requires to move forward. However, if alternative investors cannot be found, then unfortunately I fear we had better get used to life as it is now.My whole point is that it's the job of the directors to fund the long term interests of the club. I don't know how much Royle is on, but I'm sure as hell that it would be cheaper in the long run to pay Royle off now and get a new management team in, rather than possibly suffer a much reduced income from attendances in the next few seasons. The directors of the club are directors by choice, and they should realise that directorship isn't all about dining extravagently before matches and the like but that sometimes it is their responsibility as directors to put their hands in their pockets.
-
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 12:30 pm
- Contact: