
However, I cannot understand how Joe thought he was worth keeping on the pitch yesterday, we were effectively playing 10 v 11 again.

Anyone, apart from Luke

Moderators: Charnwood, Bluemike
A decent player, with aged legs, weak on tackling and defensive play, whose very creative going forward and can always create you that one chance that wins a game.bluebird wrote:My opinions on this fairy are well known, so I wont repeat them![]()
However, I cannot understand how Joe thought he was worth keeping on the pitch yesterday, we were effectively playing 10 v 11 again.![]()
Anyone, apart from Luke, care to explain what Joe sees that I don't???
Would you pick him Mork???Mork wrote:A decent player, with aged legs, weak on tackling and defensive play, whose very creative going forward and can always create you that one chance that wins a game.bluebird wrote:My opinions on this fairy are well known, so I wont repeat them![]()
However, I cannot understand how Joe thought he was worth keeping on the pitch yesterday, we were effectively playing 10 v 11 again.![]()
Anyone, apart from Luke, care to explain what Joe sees that I don't???
well you've just described half the Town side there !Mork wrote:A decent player, with aged legs, weak on tackling and defensive play, whose very creative going forward and can always create you that one chance that wins a game.bluebird wrote:My opinions on this fairy are well known, so I wont repeat them![]()
However, I cannot understand how Joe thought he was worth keeping on the pitch yesterday, we were effectively playing 10 v 11 again.![]()
Anyone, apart from Luke, care to explain what Joe sees that I don't???
What, from our current squad? Certainly, we're not exactly sitting pretty in terms of creativity.bluebird wrote:Would you pick him Mork???Mork wrote:A decent player, with aged legs, weak on tackling and defensive play, whose very creative going forward and can always create you that one chance that wins a game.bluebird wrote:My opinions on this fairy are well known, so I wont repeat them![]()
However, I cannot understand how Joe thought he was worth keeping on the pitch yesterday, we were effectively playing 10 v 11 again.![]()
Anyone, apart from Luke, care to explain what Joe sees that I don't???
Totally agree. I would much rather than a player that actually tackled and headed the ball that couldnt create too much. Currie doesnt exactly create loads of chances and uses the same 1 trick all the time! On the other hand he does have the odd good game!riviera wrote:to me currie is a luxury we cant afford at the moment, 11 battlers would be my choice before creativity with the position the club are in
shame we cant use currie like the Great Britain hockey squad used to with their penalty corner fella, he used to come on just for important set pieces
but with the current injury list we have at the moment - WHO ELSE could Joe have put in yesterday ?Vaughan8 wrote:Totally agree. I would much rather than a player that actually tackled and headed the ball that couldnt create too much. Currie doesnt exactly create loads of chances and uses the same 1 trick all the time! On the other hand he does have the odd good game!riviera wrote:to me currie is a luxury we cant afford at the moment, 11 battlers would be my choice before creativity with the position the club are in
shame we cant use currie like the Great Britain hockey squad used to with their penalty corner fella, he used to come on just for important set pieces
To be frank HB, anyone who could actually participate in the play would be nice! Currie took things to new depths yesterday. He is always caught between passages of play, and when he gets caught up in it he slows us down going forwards, or dangles his leg about like some sort of poof!hallamblue wrote:but with the current injury list we have at the moment - WHO ELSE could Joe have put in yesterday ?Vaughan8 wrote:Totally agree. I would much rather than a player that actually tackled and headed the ball that couldnt create too much. Currie doesnt exactly create loads of chances and uses the same 1 trick all the time! On the other hand he does have the odd good game!riviera wrote:to me currie is a luxury we cant afford at the moment, 11 battlers would be my choice before creativity with the position the club are in
shame we cant use currie like the Great Britain hockey squad used to with their penalty corner fella, he used to come on just for important set pieces
Well he is from Brightonbluebird wrote:To be frank HB, anyone who could actually participate in the play would be nice! Currie took things to new depths yesterday. He is always caught between passages of play, and when he gets caught up in it he slows us down going forwards, or dangles his leg about like some sort of poof!hallamblue wrote:but with the current injury list we have at the moment - WHO ELSE could Joe have put in yesterday ?Vaughan8 wrote: Totally agree. I would much rather than a player that actually tackled and headed the ball that couldnt create too much. Currie doesnt exactly create loads of chances and uses the same 1 trick all the time! On the other hand he does have the odd good game!